Random Political/Social Posting

[pipedreams]

[pipedreams]

[pipedreams]

[pipedreams]

You don't say?

[pipedreams]

[Dric902]

Tom Brady's popularity tied to rise in 'white rage and white supremacy,

https://www.foxnews.com/sports/tom-brady-popularity-tied-white-supremacy

 

.

[tous]

2 hours ago, pipedreams said:

This just in.

Four people are dead and 27 injured when a tour group of elderly Americans inadvertently found themselves between Adam Schiff and the media gathered to immortalize his every word.

When asked for comment, Senator Chuck Schumer smiled and noted, It is always satisfying when the student surpasses the master.

[janice6]

5 hours ago, pipedreams said:

Every tyrannical dictator had those that supported them.

They all paid the price.

[janice6]

1 hour ago, Dric902 said:

Tom Brady's popularity tied to rise in 'white rage and white supremacy,

https://www.foxnews.com/sports/tom-brady-popularity-tied-white-supremacy

 

.

In all the superlatives this professor uses to vilify Brady and Trump, he still doesn't recognize that he is a hate monger, he is hating others for a political belief that he condemns as unacceptable, to him.

Institutes of higher learning used to promote critical thinking and objectivity when addressing any issue, whether technical, emotional, or social.

Now, as in the case of this professor, unacceptable speech and actions that go against the liberal, leftist teachings, are condemned as a violation of the educators preaching.  The professors are adamant that they are teaching what to think, not how to think.

This professor is teaching the road to remorseless punishment, of those who dare to believe they can express themselves utilizing the freedom and liberty this Constitution allows.  Instead this professor demands that his is the only acceptable political philosophy and all others are wrong.

Does this sound like an objective approach to any problem.

 

 

[Dric902]

Chuck Canterbury, President Trump’s nominee to serve as head of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms, is likely to see his nomination withdrawn due to stringent opposition from Republican members of the Senate Judiciary Committee, the Washington Free Beacon learned on Thursday.

“Chuck Canterbury does NOT have sufficient support in the Judiciary Committee and is now expected to be held up instead of getting a vote today,” a GOP Senate aide told the Free Beacon on Thursday morning. “Republican members are (1) Concerned about his stances on gun control, and (2) there is still some bad blood for him flipping the Fraternal Order of Police in support of the First Step Act (after opposing the more moderate version), allegedly in exchange for the ATF Director nomination.”

“His 2A views are bad and he’d lose a lot of votes in committee,” a second Senate source told the Free Beacon. “We expect the White House will pull him given lack of support from Republicans on the Judiciary Committee.”

The last thing you want to see as head of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives–otherwise known as either BATFE or just the ATF–is a gun grabber. Part of the duties for the ATF is to make determinations of what is legal and what isn’t and chief that favors gun control could well interpret things far less liberally than someone who favors gun rights.

.

[pipedreams]

[pipedreams]

[pipedreams]

[pipedreams]

[pipedreams]

[pipedreams]

[Borg warner]

[pipedreams]

[deputy tom]

11 minutes ago, Borg warner said:

Pencil necked geek. tom. 

[Borg warner]

 

[railfancwb]

Actually it isn’t... Bullshit... Bullshit dissolves with rain and weathering and becomes fertilizer. This stuff doesn’t.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[railfancwb]

Frightening!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[railfancwb]

The machine should be set on slow and the process streamed to video.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[pipedreams]

[janice6]

56 minutes ago, pipedreams said:

 The American citizen is judged to  be too stupid to know, who or what, philosophy should run this country, by those who call themselves liberals. 

There is nothing liberal about a political party that is actively pursuing vengeance against the winner of the Presidential election over his full term in office , when he wasn't "their" chosen one. 

They have chosen to vilify all persons involved in serving his office, even his family members, while declaring that those people supporting the leftist liberals choice are exempt from retribution. 

This is setting the precedent that anyone the usurpers are against politically, will be subject to their castigation and opposition.  We have seen this all during during Trump's service to this country.

This group of self appointed Socialists are bent on imposing their control on this country without regard for the citizen's right to determine their country's course in history.

Ruling a country is far more difficult when you don't have a puppet regime in place to rubber stamp all the issues you want solved in favor of global politics, money and power.

Trump was the pick of the people and now the people are being barraged by the losing party for their audacity in selecting their choice, and not that of the party that deems themselves the only legitimate rulers of the nation.  When does this turn into "high crimes and misdemeanors".