Jump to content

Trains


Eric
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, Eric said:

nq2js3k6u3441.jpg

More information

Runaway train crashes into Union Station - Washington D.C. January 15 1953 [960 x 757]

Find this Pin and more on HistoryPorn by ponny jane.
Tags
What others are saying

The Federal Express loses its brakes and crashes into Washington Union Station. No one is killed, but it still holds the title as the worst train wreck ever in the nation's capital to date.

Santa Fe diesel passenger locomotive hangs over Aliso St. after running off the end of its track at Union Station.

Post with 0 votes and 1018 views. currency looked in 1923 x

Runaway train crashes into Union Station - Washington D.C. January 15 1953 [960 x 757]

https://www.pinterest.pt/pin/713328028453176866/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

338dyentf9141.jpg.b4fcd9218ef639c74c6989a908d87279.jpg

Street running of regular freight/passenger trains was once somewhat common. Almost always because the community grew along the track rather than the railroad deciding that the shortest distance between two points was down that street.

There is a community in Kentucky - La Grange - where street running has become a feature rather than a bug.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Street_running


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, railfancwb said:


Wow! Bet the drawbridge track has major speed restrictions there.

The through track looks narrow gauge and electrified. Is it narrow gauge? Is the drawbridge track narrow gauge?

Where is this?

 

I don’t know where it is, but it is narrow gage. I’m sure its 5 mph, 10 would amaze me

.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, railfancwb said:


Bet this little event cost the railroad well into seven figures, maybe even eight figures.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It took out an entire Control Point and crossovers into a yard lead and a siding.

 

 

  • Sad 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators

Train guys, I’ve got a question. I was driving through OKlahoma City last week and saw something unusual. On a couple of sidings behind a big industrial building, there were two trains made up of only locomotives. One train was more than twenty locomotives, all coupled together. The other was maybe ten locomotives. 
 

Why would so many locomotives be coupled up and travel together? The yard with the building and sidings didn’t look big enough to be a maintenance facility. It got me curious. Thoughts?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Eric said:

Train guys, I’ve got a question. I was driving through OKlahoma City last week and saw something unusual. On a couple of sidings behind a big industrial building, there were two trains made up of only locomotives. One train was more than twenty locomotives, all coupled together. The other was maybe ten locomotives. 
 

Why would so many locomotives be coupled up and travel together? The yard with the building and sidings didn’t look big enough to be a maintenance facility. It got me curious. Thoughts?

It’s called a ‘power move’

only the first couple of engines are working, the rest are in tow.

when you have literally thousands of engines on the system, they get loaded up in some terminals, but short of power in others. 

Usually we can add engines to the trains going the right direction. If you see a train with 4 or more engines, this is probably happening. Sometime you just gotta man up and pay a crew to move a bunch of engines to where you need them.

we have an entire “power desk” that does nothing but track locations of engines, inspection deadlines, maintenance records, foreign power on our system (the RR charge each other for wear on their engines)

 

they are a pain in the arse to run btw.

Edited by Dric902
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When at Spencer NC Transportation Museum a few years ago for their “Streamliner” event I saw this on the streamlined diesel Union Pacific sent. I have since seen equivalent signs on other diesels. Found out why... First, they use only water - no anti-freeze - as engine coolant for cost and environmental reasons. Second, the practice of letting the engines idle to prevent freezing in cold weather is no longer done on large scale, once again for cost and environmental reasons. 
 

 

9A36AE60-4E8D-46C4-B9BE-AA0550489599.jpeg

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Please Donate To TBS

    Please donate to TBS.
    Your support is needed and it is greatly appreciated.
×
×
  • Create New...