pipedreams Posted December 1, 2022 Share Posted December 1, 2022 3 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pipedreams Posted December 1, 2022 Share Posted December 1, 2022 3 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pipedreams Posted December 1, 2022 Share Posted December 1, 2022 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LostinTexas Posted December 1, 2022 Share Posted December 1, 2022 2 hours ago, pipedreams said: I don't think it is uncommon enough to call it "Rare", but certainly uncommon. We would see a few cases a year, and the people who had it seemed to follow no pattern, at least in the sample we had to work off of. Certainly wasn't main stream though. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pipedreams Posted December 1, 2022 Share Posted December 1, 2022 3 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pipedreams Posted December 1, 2022 Share Posted December 1, 2022 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pipedreams Posted December 2, 2022 Share Posted December 2, 2022 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pipedreams Posted December 2, 2022 Share Posted December 2, 2022 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inyo Tim Posted December 4, 2022 Share Posted December 4, 2022 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pipedreams Posted December 4, 2022 Share Posted December 4, 2022 2 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pipedreams Posted December 4, 2022 Share Posted December 4, 2022 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
railfancwb Posted December 5, 2022 Share Posted December 5, 2022 5 hours ago, pipedreams said: Jab. Not vaccine. Jab. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schmidt Meister Posted December 7, 2022 Author Share Posted December 7, 2022 1 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inyo Tim Posted December 7, 2022 Share Posted December 7, 2022 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inyo Tim Posted December 7, 2022 Share Posted December 7, 2022 4 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inyo Tim Posted December 7, 2022 Share Posted December 7, 2022 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inyo Tim Posted December 7, 2022 Share Posted December 7, 2022 5 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schmidt Meister Posted December 7, 2022 Author Share Posted December 7, 2022 “That Is Where Tyranny Starts”: New Zealand May Take Baby From Parents Demanding ‘Unvaccinated’ Blood For Heart Surgery. Over 100 anti-vaccination protests showed up in New Zealand to support the parents of a critically ill 4-month-old baby in New Zealand who demanded that the hospital provide supplementary blood from unvaxxinated (sic) donors before the child goes under the knife for pulmonary valve stenosis, a heart valve disorder. The boy’s mother says she wants “safe blood” to be used, which her lawyer described as a fear of blood containing traces of vaccines using mRNA technology. The request has been denied by New Zealand health service, which says vaccines pose no risk to donor supplies, according to RNZ. On Tuesday, the Auckland High Court will decide whether to grant a request to remove the child from the family to perform the surgery. Paul White, a lawyer for Te Whatu Ora, aka Health New Zealand, described the baby as “getting sicker with every heartbeat.” Te Whatu Ora is making an application under the Care of Children Act regarding the baby who needs open heart surgery. It is asking that the baby be placed under the guardianship of the court. Te Whatu Ora then wants the court to appoint the doctors as agents of the court for medical care, and the parents agents of the court for all other care. -RNZ According to White, a child with this condition would have been treated by now. Sue Grey, a lawyer for the family, said the doctors are dismissing the parents as conspiracy theorists and ignoring their concerns. A full hearing on the matter will be held on Tuesday. One supporter of the family, Sarah McNaulty, said she was standing up for freedom of choice. “There’s so many people lined up to give their blood freely,” she said, adding “That is where tyranny starts. When the state provides us with not being able to give blood freely to a patient that needs it.” According to officials, the Blood Service does not segregate blood from vaccinated and unvaccinated donors, and that there is no risk from the Covid-19 vaccine. https://summit.news/2022/12/06/that-is-where-tyranny-starts-new-zealand-may-take-baby-from-parents-demanding-unvaccinated-blood-for-heart-surgery/ 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pipedreams Posted December 7, 2022 Share Posted December 7, 2022 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pipedreams Posted December 7, 2022 Share Posted December 7, 2022 1 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inyo Tim Posted December 8, 2022 Share Posted December 8, 2022 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schmidt Meister Posted December 8, 2022 Author Share Posted December 8, 2022 Dr. McCullough: mRNA from COVID vax transfers from jabbed to unjabbed, ‘changing human genome.’ (My warning: You might not want to trade sputum, or any other bodily fluids, with one of the vaxxed if you take being pureblooded seriously.) ‘It's conceivable that two vaccinated people could actually pass the code for Pfizer or Moderna into their baby, permanently,’ the renowned epidemiologist said. (LifeSiteNews) — In a recent interview, distinguished internist, cardiologist, and epidemiologist Dr. Peter McCullough shared how studies have indicated that synthetic mRNA from the Pfizer and Moderna experimental COVID vaccines may last permanently in the body, can also transfer to the unvaccinated, and is “changing the human genome.” “It looks like the messenger RNA is transferring from the vaccinated to the unvaccinated now,” McCullough told Tanya Gaw from Action4Canada on November 24. The Dallas-based physician has had a renowned career in the medical field, including authoring 677 articles in scientific peer-reviewed journals, and remains the most published individual in his field in history. McCullough referenced an article of his where he cited a study by Helene Banoun showing that lipid nanoparticles that carry the mRNA spread throughout the body and “have been shown to be able to be excreted through body fluids (sweat, sputum, breast milk) and to pass the transplacental barrier.” “And in a paper by Fertig and Colleagues, the messenger RNA is found circulating in blood for at least two weeks.” the physician told Gaw. “And the curves were not going down. That’s as long as they looked.” “Röltgen and colleagues has found messenger RNA in the vaccinated in lymph nodes for months,” he explained. “It looks like the body’s not clearing it out.” Finally, another study “from Hanna and colleagues in JAMA showed that the messenger RNA is in the breast milk of ill-advised women who took the vaccine during pregnancy or afterwards,” he said. Summarizing these thoughts, McCullough proposed the rhetorical question: “Could you actually take a vaccine inadvertently by close contact, kissing, sexual contact, [or] breastfeeding? It looks like the answer is ‘yes.’” Furthermore, he explained that the mRNA has “never been demonstrated to actually leave the body. They look like they’re permanent, as well as the spike protein that’s produced after them. This is very disturbing.” “This messenger RNA, it looks like it’s for keeps. Every shot is accumulating in the body with no ability for the body to get rid of it,” the former president of the Cardiorenal Society of America explained. Read the rest at: https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/dr-mccullough-mrna-from-covid-vax-transfers-from-jabbed-to-unjabbed-changing-human-genome/?utm_source=popular 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schmidt Meister Posted December 8, 2022 Author Share Posted December 8, 2022 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
janice6 Posted December 8, 2022 Share Posted December 8, 2022 58 minutes ago, Schmidt Meister said: I saw this right away. No one seems to be astute enough in the news field to see the elephant in the room. One announcement stated Flu and Pneumonia produced 600,000 deaths in that year. The next Covid year they announced 600,000 deaths with only a few from Flu and Pneumonia. The blind could figure this one out. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schmidt Meister Posted December 8, 2022 Author Share Posted December 8, 2022 21 minutes ago, janice6 said: I saw this right away. No one seems to be astute enough in the news field to see the elephant in the room. One announcement stated Flu and Pneumonia produced 600,000 deaths in that year. The next Covid year they announced 600,000 deaths with only a few from Flu and Pneumonia. The blind could figure this one out. Yeah, it was blatantly obvious. Facebook will slap a restriction on you for pointing it out, as evidenced by this, and my response: 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now