Unfreaking believable

[El Spicoli]

In my 5 yrs with CPS as a Special Inv. I constantly railed against social workers, supervisors, and project mgrs.  So much so that I sought out counseling.  I was deep throat for a news story that aired locally, I reached out to my House Rep. and the State Senator that created my position.  All to no avail.   I find this story absolutely horrifying.  CPS doesn't just do a removal.  It has to be cleared by a judge.  It seems our "justice system", like CPS, like the Feds have failed the American tax paying citizen......again.

Indiana parents warn nation after child is removed from home for improper pronoun usage: ‘Can happen anywhere’ (msn.com)

[Batesmotel]

Time for the purge. 

[minervadoe]

Improper pronoun usage?  WTF?

I've got your pronouns right here:

 

[railfancwb]

Among other things, the classic American West was noted for forming Vigilance Committees when normal laws and law enforcement were non-existent or corrupt. 

[janice6]

3 hours ago, El Spicoli said:

In my 5 yrs with CPS as a Special Inv. I constantly railed against social workers, supervisors, and project mgrs.  So much so that I sought out counseling.  I was deep throat for a news story that aired locally, I reached out to my House Rep. and the State Senator that created my position.  All to no avail.   I find this story absolutely horrifying.  CPS doesn't just do a removal.  It has to be cleared by a judge.  It seems our "justice system", like CPS, like the Feds have failed the American tax paying citizen......again.

Indiana parents warn nation after child is removed from home for improper pronoun usage: ‘Can happen anywhere’ (msn.com)

So if the child believes "itself" to be a serial killer, the state can put it into a home that condones serial killers? 

What about state mental commitments if the person being committed doesn't believe they are mentally challenged?

[Borg warner]

4 hours ago, El Spicoli said:

In my 5 yrs with CPS as a Special Inv. I constantly railed against social workers, supervisors, and project mgrs.  So much so that I sought out counseling.  I was deep throat for a news story that aired locally, I reached out to my House Rep. and the State Senator that created my position.  All to no avail.   I find this story absolutely horrifying.  CPS doesn't just do a removal.  It has to be cleared by a judge.  It seems our "justice system", like CPS, like the Feds have failed the American tax paying citizen......again.

Indiana parents warn nation after child is removed from home for improper pronoun usage: ‘Can happen anywhere’ (msn.com)

 From the Fox News article: "In 2019, Mary and Jeremy's son told them that he identified as a girl, but in line with their Catholic religious beliefs that God created human beings with an immutable sex, male or female, they did not believe in referring to him using pronouns and a name inconsistent with his biology."

 

Now I WONDER where the kid got the idea that he might be a girl if it wasn't taught to him by his parents??? Obviously he got the idea from the school and now it's messing with his mind and the indoctrination will only get worse now that he's been taken away from his parents. 20 years ago this would have been unthinkable but now a lot of people are going along with it.

Indiana parents warn nation after child is removed from home for improper pronoun usage: ‘Can happen anywhere’
Parents ask Supreme Court to hold Indiana responsible for removing transgender child from their home

 

A Catholic couple in Indiana is asking the Supreme Court to hold the state accountable for keeping their child out of their home after they declined to use his chosen name and pronouns. In M.C. and J.C. v. Indiana Department of Child Services, Mary and Jeremy Cox are appealing to the Supreme Court after they were investigated by Indiana officials for refusing to refer to their son using pronouns and a name inconsistent with his biological sex. 

Becket is pursuing the case on behalf of the Coxes, arguing state courts allowed Indiana to keep the child from living in his parents' home due to their disagreement with the child's gender identity because of their religious beliefs. Notably, upon completing the investigation, the state determined the allegations of abuse against Mary and Jeremy were unsubstantiated, but still argued that the disagreement over gender identity was distressing to their child. 

Lori Windham, vice president and senior counsel at the Becket law firm, told Fox News Digital that no parent should ever have to endure what Mary and Jeremy have been forced to go through. "Keeping a child away from loving parents because of their religious beliefs—even when the state admits there was no abuse or neglect—is wrong and it’s against the law," she said. "The Court should take this case and make clear that other states can’t take children away because of ideological disagreements."

In 2019, Mary and Jeremy's son told them that he identified as a girl, but in line with their Catholic religious beliefs that God created human beings with an immutable sex, male or female, they did not believe in referring to him using pronouns and a name inconsistent with his biology. In addition, the Coxes believed their son was struggling with underlying mental health conditions, including an eating disorder, so they sought therapeutic care for both. But, in 2021, Indiana officials began investigating the Coxes after a report found they were not referring to their child by his preferred gender identity, removing the teen from their custody and placing him in a "gender-affirming" home. Despite the unsubstantiated claims of abuse, they claimed the Coxes made the child's eating disorder worse even though it worsened after he was removed and placed in a transition-affirming home.

The Indiana Department of Child Services declined a Fox News Digital request for comment, saying, "DCS does not comment on ongoing litigation." 

"This is what every parent is afraid of," Mary and Jeremy Cox said in a press release. "We love our son and wanted to care for him, but the state of Indiana robbed us of that opportunity by taking him from our home and banning us from speaking to him about gender."  "We are hopeful that the Justices will take our case and protect other parents from having to endure the nightmare we did," they added. When the case was first heard in trial court, Indiana officials argued the child "should be in a home where she is accepted for who she is" and restricted the Coxes’ visitation time to a few hours once a week, which barred them from speaking to him about their religious views on human sexuality and gender identity. Even though the court determined the Coxes were fit parents, it upheld the removal of their child which was later upheld by the appeals court. 

"If this can happen in Indiana, it can happen anywhere," Windhamn said. "Tearing a child away from loving parents because of their religious beliefs, which are shared by millions of Americans, is an outrage to the law, parental rights, and basic human decency. If the Supreme Court doesn’t take this case, how many times will this happen to other families?

 

Here's a link to the fox news article and there's a good interview with the the Indiana State attorney General. More states should have more state AG's like this one.

https://www.foxnews.com/media/indiana-parents-warn-nation-after-child-removed-home-improper-pronoun-usage-can-happen-anywhere

[El Spicoli]

Let's not forget, according to that witch, it takes a village....  to indoctrinate your children to want to live under Marxist rule.

[Mrs.Cicero]

Homeschool.  

[DAKA]

Military

Any DRILL SERGEANT i'll straighten that right out... 

[Rellik]

On 2/21/2024 at 9:12 AM, El Spicoli said:

Let's not forget, according to that witch, it takes a village....  to indoctrinate your children to want to live under Marxist rule.

It take a village..........and an idiot to believe that. Thomas Sowell.