pipedreams Posted January 21, 2020 Share Posted January 21, 2020 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pipedreams Posted January 21, 2020 Share Posted January 21, 2020 (edited) Edited January 21, 2020 by pipedreams 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pipedreams Posted January 21, 2020 Share Posted January 21, 2020 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pipedreams Posted January 21, 2020 Share Posted January 21, 2020 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pipedreams Posted January 21, 2020 Share Posted January 21, 2020 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
janice6 Posted January 22, 2020 Share Posted January 22, 2020 4 hours ago, pipedreams said: Once an idiot, always an idiot! Reading is something everyone should learn to do, before they get to be her age! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
railfancwb Posted January 22, 2020 Share Posted January 22, 2020 2 hours ago, pipedreams said: I still don’t understand how she was allowed to primary out a senior Democrat in a gerrymandered district so safe the Republicans put up no creditable opposition to her. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Posted January 22, 2020 Share Posted January 22, 2020 14 hours ago, Dric902 said: Thanks, I was having trouble finding the dictionary definition of “Fudd” I always thought it was a hunter for gun control a representative republic is the very dictionary definition of compromise. One party absolute rule makes for a knee jerk, absolutist reformation every few years. Civilizations don’t last that way. ”turning the Titanic” is a lot more stable than fighter jock maneuvers every administration. Full auto was already ‘nearly’ banned under the NFA along with state lines being treated like national borders when it comes to transporting firearms, every ammo purchase was recorded and saved. The ‘86 limit on automatic firearms wasn’t a new thing, it was a Democrat attempt at a limit of an already existing restriction that would have been, without the whole ‘compromise’ thing a complete ban. incrementalism works over time, absolutism loses and then complains about it. How do you eat an elephant? One bite at a time. If you try it all at once, you choke. focus on the direction and you get closer to your destination. Shortcuts get you lost other citizens, with other representation, have different opinions. And they carry as much weight as any other. The writings of the Founders about the writing of the Constitution are fascinating. Forward thinking, well constructed. Slow moving, deliberative, considered legislative action, makes for a long lasting Republic that doesn’t tear itself apart. Thats why it has lasted so long. . I stopped read at the third line where you give the democrat "definition of compromise" line of bullshit. YOU keep giving **** away and we have nothing. In the nearly half century I have been alive there has been ZERO given to gun owners, why is it you ask, because folks like you give it all a away just a little at a time. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dric902 Posted January 22, 2020 Share Posted January 22, 2020 ‘Kay 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pipedreams Posted January 22, 2020 Share Posted January 22, 2020 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dric902 Posted January 22, 2020 Share Posted January 22, 2020 (edited) Tulsi Gabbard is suing Hillary Clinton for defamation: https://d3ba7j4nna908t.cloudfront.net/attachments/Tulsi-HRC_2020-01-22_Complaint_filed.pdf Tulsi Gabbard is running for President of the United States, a position Clinton has long coveted, but has not been able to attain... ...whether out of personal animus, political enmity, or fear of real change within a political party Clinton and her allies have long dominated—Clinton lied about her perceived rival Tulsi Gabbard. She did so publicly, unambiguously, and with obvious malicious intent. Tulsi has been harmed by Clinton’s lies—and American democracy has suffered as well... ...With this action, Tulsi seeks to hold Clinton, and the political elites who enable her, accountable for distorting the truth in the middle of a critical Presidential election... ...(Gabbard) publicly endorsed Senator Sanders, becoming the most prominent politician to do so at the time. Clinton—a cutthroat politician by any account—has never forgotten this perceived slight. And in October 2019, she sought retribution by lying, publicly and loudly, about Tulsi Gabbard... demanding $50 million in damages it won’t go anywhere, but I will be fun to watch . . Edited January 22, 2020 by Dric902 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M&P15T Posted January 22, 2020 Share Posted January 22, 2020 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Borg warner Posted January 22, 2020 Share Posted January 22, 2020 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Borg warner Posted January 22, 2020 Share Posted January 22, 2020 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
janice6 Posted January 22, 2020 Share Posted January 22, 2020 2 hours ago, Borg warner said: The New York times thinks this is the best the Democrats have to offer! Pathetic, isn't it! 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dric902 Posted January 22, 2020 Share Posted January 22, 2020 8 minutes ago, janice6 said: The New York times thinks this is the best the Democrats have to offer! Pathetic, isn't it! They have given up on the White House now it’s about a bunch of Senators and Reps you’ve never heard of before getting exposure for the election . . 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pipedreams Posted January 22, 2020 Share Posted January 22, 2020 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pipedreams Posted January 22, 2020 Share Posted January 22, 2020 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pipedreams Posted January 22, 2020 Share Posted January 22, 2020 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pipedreams Posted January 22, 2020 Share Posted January 22, 2020 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pipedreams Posted January 22, 2020 Share Posted January 22, 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pipedreams Posted January 22, 2020 Share Posted January 22, 2020 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pipedreams Posted January 22, 2020 Share Posted January 22, 2020 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
janice6 Posted January 22, 2020 Share Posted January 22, 2020 2 hours ago, pipedreams said: because they are the same people that are controlling the media. They won't blow the whistle on themselves. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
railfancwb Posted January 22, 2020 Share Posted January 22, 2020 7 hours ago, Dric902 said: Tulsi Gabbard is suing Hillary Clinton for defamation: https://d3ba7j4nna908t.cloudfront.net/attachments/Tulsi-HRC_2020-01-22_Complaint_filed.pdf Tulsi Gabbard is running for President of the United States, a position Clinton has long coveted, but has not been able to attain... ...whether out of personal animus, political enmity, or fear of real change within a political party Clinton and her allies have long dominated—Clinton lied about her perceived rival Tulsi Gabbard. She did so publicly, unambiguously, and with obvious malicious intent. Tulsi has been harmed by Clinton’s lies—and American democracy has suffered as well... ...With this action, Tulsi seeks to hold Clinton, and the political elites who enable her, accountable for distorting the truth in the middle of a critical Presidential election... ...(Gabbard) publicly endorsed Senator Sanders, becoming the most prominent politician to do so at the time. Clinton—a cutthroat politician by any account—has never forgotten this perceived slight. And in October 2019, she sought retribution by lying, publicly and loudly, about Tulsi Gabbard... demanding $50 million in damages it won’t go anywhere, but I will be fun to watch . . Arguably Clinton would have legal immunity against such a lawsuit had she made the statements in Congress while a Senator. As an “ordinary” private citizen she should have no such immunity. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now