Jump to content

No vote, no impeachment


Ricordo
 Share

Recommended Posts

Yes, this was never intended to be a real goal.  It was stated before the impeachment announcement, that if Trump investigated Biden's son, Pelosi would seek impeachment proceedings against him.  It was a threat, extortion if you will, for suggesting ethics investigations on Democrats.

Trump withstood years of investigations to no end, while now the Democrats claim to be immune to the same thing.  Hmmmmm.  Double standard based on political party...……….  Sure, why not!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, janice6 said:

Yes, this was never intended to be a real goal.  It was stated before the impeachment announcement, that if Trump investigated Biden's son, Pelosi would seek impeachment proceedings against him.  It was a threat, extortion if you will, for suggesting ethics investigations on Democrats.

Trump withstood years of investigations to no end, while now the Democrats claim to be immune to the same thing.  Hmmmmm.  Double standard based on political party...……….  Sure, why not!

This is what I was wondering also. Why were there no inquires when obuma tapped trumps phones or obuma's supposed involvement in the steel dossier?

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mike said:

Mostly wishful thinking.  If the repubs sink on supporting Trump, they all are nothing more then Democrats and should be treated as such.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Go ahead. Please do it!

That will bring on a trial in the Senate. That would also allow Trumps lawyers to examine and call all those they felt relevant to testify. Everyone involved in Russiagate, Hillarygate, Comeygate, Muellergate, and every other "Gate" that has gone off the reservation over the past two years.

It will be Spectacular! If any of them show up.

 

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This impeachment issue is a **** show.  Obama could have been impeached over and over again on his own actions.  Now, how is here say any sort of reliable information?  I could say that I heard that one of my least favorite supervisors, who was a walking EEO/Management Inquiry was penetrating dogs.  Should be arrested for animal cruelty, because I heard a rumor he may have done that?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Focus, #almostalwaystrumpers! Focus.

Even though the Courts give great leeway to Congress' investigative hearings, they have to respond to an specific purpose. If they want to subpoena someone for proper investigative purposes, the Courts will enforce it.  But without a vote for impeachment there's no way that the Courts can enforce impeachment processes...because it will not refer a proper purpose.

We know this is all politicking of the worst kind. So force them to vote. One-third of the country (socialists) will approve. Some independents might approve. A few Republicans like Romney will approve (Btw, I still throw-up a little when I remember that I voted for that scum). But let them show all their true colors. They want to use the word "impeachment", let's have a vote. Let them dig their own graves.

 

Edited by Ricordo
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

they got President Trump right where they want him this time,He can`t get out of this one!   :anim_rofl2:

 

Pelosi has lost control of her Congress,and she has Probably just been trolled by President Trump into no longer being able to push anything forward like Gun Control,Infrastructure,Health Care.(which is good for us) all the time to work on any of that will now be filled by Committee leaders jockeying for chairman`s seat,committee leaders,Evidentiary hearings,press conferences,and witness testimony hearings Etc. 

Whether this was done on purpose or not by President Trump is anyone`s guess but.

this is just a gathering of chair people talking about doing what they are already doing and maybe creating another inquiry on doing the same all based on something that they had no knowledge of and later found to be nothing there.

Biden will be the big loser in this,Warren will move ahead and Liawatha is unelectable.

Pelosi still does`nt have the Impeachment votes and she knows she won`t get them,not because the Senate won`t even look at Impeachment.

but because she knows it would be a red sweep of all the Districts they need to hold in 2020.

 

as of right now the Democrats have been trolled into looking into whether an Executive branch elected official has attempted to use a Foreign Government to assist in Election tampering and digging up dirt of a Candidate.where have we heard THAT before?

 

and whether a secret server is being used to hide Official Government Memos and transcripts,again sounds familiar??

Best Election ever!

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kindly allow me to dissipate any doubts about about the legal technicalities that I presented earlier today.

To much fanfare, Pelosi announced to its adoring fans that they had initiated an "official impeachment inquiry".  An official impeachment inquiry can only, according to the Constitution (or as Dems love to call it---toilet paper) be initiated with a House vote of approval.

Before a Federal Judge with his pants on, a request to enforce a subpoena (btw, no need to go through USDOJ) for an "official impeachment inquiry" without a vote, will not be proper. They can call anyway they want, but Judges also read the news along with the comics. It will not be pleasurable for the one who has to argue such an underhanded request. Judges are not expected to believe what no one else would not believe.

So rant on Congressman Schaff. You're doing great!

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/27/2019 at 2:26 PM, Ricordo said:

Kindly allow me to dissipate any doubts about about the legal technicalities that I presented earlier today.

To much fanfare, Pelosi announced to its adoring fans that they had initiated an "official impeachment inquiry".  An official impeachment inquiry can only, according to the Constitution (or as Dems love to call it---toilet paper) be initiated with a House vote of approval.

Before a Federal Judge with his pants on, a request to enforce a subpoena (btw, no need to go through USDOJ) for an "official impeachment inquiry" without a vote, will not be proper. They can call anyway they want, but Judges also read the news along with the comics. It will not be pleasurable for the one who has to argue such an underhanded request. Judges are not expected to believe what no one else would not believe.

So rant on Congressman Schaff. You're doing great!

 

You're wrong!  There is no Constitutional term known as an "Official Impeachment Inquiry"    The only thing the COTUS states in Article 1, Section 2, Clause 5, is that the House shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.  The House gets to make it's own rules.

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

You're wrong!  There is no Constitutional term known as an "Official Impeachment Inquiry"    The only thing the COTUS states in Article 1, Section 2, Clause 5, is that the House shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.  The House gets to make it's own rules.

A fine example on how Democrats will read anything into something even if it's glaringly obvious that it is not there as long as it suits their own particular purpose. 

And the beat goes on...

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Please Donate To TBS

    Please donate to TBS.
    Your support is needed and it is greatly appreciated.
×
×
  • Create New...