Random Political/Social Posting

[ChuteTheMall]

[ChuteTheMall]

[ChuteTheMall]

[ChuteTheMall]

[ChuteTheMall]

[ChuteTheMall]

[Schmidt Meister]

[ChuteTheMall]

[ChuteTheMall]

[ChuteTheMall]

[Schmidt Meister]

Tragic Kingdom News - LOL

Disney has lost $50 billion in value since war with Florida began.

Disney’s stock was down more than 2% on Friday and by more than 8.5% over the past few days as Florida lawmakers work to punish the company for wading into the state’s politics. The stock's market cap has declined by about $46.6 billion since March 1, just days before the company came out against the legislation.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/economy/disney-has-lost-50-billion-in-value-since-war-with-florida-began

[Schmidt Meister]

Durham springs the trap on Hillary Clinton’s lawyer.
Michael Sussmann could unravel the whole skein of Russiagate lies.

The month of May won’t be a merry one for Michael Sussmann, one of Hillary Clinton’s top lawyers at her favorite election law firm Perkins Coie, who is facing a criminal charge of lying to the FBI when he passed information to the Bureau’s general counsel, James Baker. Sussman stated explicitly that he was acting as a “good citizen,” not as a lawyer for Trump’s election opponents.
Wink, wink. Nudge, nudge.
The tip was false. It described a secret, traitorous back-channel connection between candidate Trump and the Kremlin and included some “white papers” as “proof.” But that deceit is not part of this criminal charge. Nor is Sussmann’s follow-up meeting with the CIA, where he also claimed to be a “good citizen” not representing anyone, and passed on the same false information, amplifying it with still more data about a secret Russian phone that was always near Trump. The CIA quickly determined the internet data was bogus and perhaps created by Hillary’s anti-Trump group. It also recognized that crucial data had been omitted to create a false impression and perhaps that some of the data had been made up or spoofed.
But again, Sussmann is not being charged with that, at least not yet. Nor is he being charged with participating in a broader criminal conspiracy. Some filings by Special Counsel John Durham suggest he may be preparing such charges against Clinton’s larger network of hoaxers, but he hasn’t leveled those charges yet. He’s going after Sussmann first.
Although a single count of lying to the FBI might seem like a relatively minor charge, Durham is pursuing it for three important reasons. First, a false statement to the FBI is a felony in its own right, or, rather, it is if the statement “materially affected” a federal investigation. Second, Durham seems to have rock-solid evidence. More on that in a minute. Third, if Sussmann goes down, he will have powerful incentives to help Durham nail even bigger players and perhaps help take down the conspiracy in which they jointly participated. After all, Sussmann was close to the epicenter of the Trump-Russia collusion hoax. He must know a lot about how it was planned and executed, who was directly involved, who knew about it, who paid for it, and how it all worked.

https://web.archive.org/web/20220423150318/https://spectatorworld.com/topic/durham-springs-the-trap-on-hillary-clintons-lawyer/

[Cougar_ml]

3 hours ago, Schmidt Meister said:

Durham springs the trap on Hillary Clinton’s lawyer.
Michael Sussmann could unravel the whole skein of Russiagate lies.

The month of May won’t be a merry one for Michael Sussmann, one of Hillary Clinton’s top lawyers at her favorite election law firm Perkins Coie, who is facing a criminal charge of lying to the FBI when he passed information to the Bureau’s general counsel, James Baker. Sussman stated explicitly that he was acting as a “good citizen,” not as a lawyer for Trump’s election opponents.
Wink, wink. Nudge, nudge.
The tip was false. It described a secret, traitorous back-channel connection between candidate Trump and the Kremlin and included some “white papers” as “proof.” But that deceit is not part of this criminal charge. Nor is Sussmann’s follow-up meeting with the CIA, where he also claimed to be a “good citizen” not representing anyone, and passed on the same false information, amplifying it with still more data about a secret Russian phone that was always near Trump. The CIA quickly determined the internet data was bogus and perhaps created by Hillary’s anti-Trump group. It also recognized that crucial data had been omitted to create a false impression and perhaps that some of the data had been made up or spoofed.
But again, Sussmann is not being charged with that, at least not yet. Nor is he being charged with participating in a broader criminal conspiracy. Some filings by Special Counsel John Durham suggest he may be preparing such charges against Clinton’s larger network of hoaxers, but he hasn’t leveled those charges yet. He’s going after Sussmann first.
Although a single count of lying to the FBI might seem like a relatively minor charge, Durham is pursuing it for three important reasons. First, a false statement to the FBI is a felony in its own right, or, rather, it is if the statement “materially affected” a federal investigation. Second, Durham seems to have rock-solid evidence. More on that in a minute. Third, if Sussmann goes down, he will have powerful incentives to help Durham nail even bigger players and perhaps help take down the conspiracy in which they jointly participated. After all, Sussmann was close to the epicenter of the Trump-Russia collusion hoax. He must know a lot about how it was planned and executed, who was directly involved, who knew about it, who paid for it, and how it all worked.

https://web.archive.org/web/20220423150318/https://spectatorworld.com/topic/durham-springs-the-trap-on-hillary-clintons-lawyer/

So in other words, we shouldn't be surprised when he ends up suicided in the near future?

[pipedreams]

[pipedreams]

[pipedreams]

[pipedreams]

[pipedreams]

[pipedreams]

[pipedreams]

[pipedreams]

[pipedreams]

[pipedreams]

[pipedreams]

[pipedreams]