Jump to content

Katie Hill (Dem from California) - Hoo boy......


SC Tiger
 Share

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, holyjohnson said:

she Resigned.

 

must have been the "Nazi" tattoo,cuz Dems don`t resign for anything involving morals or decency or Legality....

Nevertheless, it's a good opportunity for ethics in government when even one resigns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmmm

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/10/24/pollak-katie-hill-deserves-the-due-process-she-would-have-denied-brett-kavanaugh/

https://www.breitbart.com/midterm-election/2018/10/13/democrat-katie-hill-attacked-brett-kavanaugh-after-being-caught-on-video-making-sex-joke-about-staffer/

Shouldn't the picture of her with a bong also be concerning? Doesn't the federal government, you know her job, still say pot is illegal?

 

 

 

 

Thanks TBO for the direction, I still didn't find anything (to many results) but thanks regardless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, TBO said:

Told you there was more:

 

Katie Hill paid $5G bonus to alleged male lover, used ‘influence’ to get jobs for husband: reports

 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/katie-hill-paid-5g-bonus-to-alleged-male-lover-used-influence-to-get-jobs-for-husband-reports

 

Sent from my Jack boot using Copatalk

 

 

 

 

In for a Penny, in for a pounding.

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/25/2019 at 6:34 PM, janice6 said:

Her nude graphic pictures were put on social media for public display prior to her being offended by the belated response.

Now, how can she demand that the publisher is hurting her reputation when at least she and or her husband solicited participants and comments of her pornography.

I'm guessing it's rather like if you take naked pictues of your wife, and then someone steals the camera and posts them on the internet.  Yeah, you took the pictures but you never intended for them to be published.  

As to the SubReddit - I don't know.  I don't know if those pics were meant to be anonymous or what.

On 10/25/2019 at 2:35 PM, janice6 said:

When you elect a Congress person to represent you, you expect they have good moral judgement.   This is not true, but should be. 

The appearance of impropriety is just as bad as impropriety, in public officials.

People that make the laws, people that enforce the laws, and people that sit in judgement of others who break the laws, should be held to a higher standard than the general public.  If instead they practice what they preach, then we are all in trouble.

I hate to say this but neither side has much ground to stand on.  Trump has his issues.  Both Rs and Ds have had members with moral problems.  So IMO from a party standpoint, both live in glass houses.

I think the issue as of the article was that she was doing this with a member of her congressional staff.  That is a definite no-no.

I think they might be on Reddit, but they may have been scrubbed now.  Once the article broke, Hill became aware of them and went on the attack getting them removed.

Edited by SC Tiger
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, TBO said:

Told you there was more:

 

Katie Hill paid $5G bonus to alleged male lover, used ‘influence’ to get jobs for husband: reports

 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/katie-hill-paid-5g-bonus-to-alleged-male-lover-used-influence-to-get-jobs-for-husband-reports

 

Sent from my Jack boot using Copatalk

 

 

 

 

That is a whole 'nother ball of wax, and makes this much worse.  Now she's using her office for personal gain.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And she is out of there!  Dick Weiner sent his weiner pics to random people.  She sent her whole body, while committing a felony for the whole world to see, including children.  So, I think she was worse than the former Weiner.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Moshe said:

And she is out of there!  Dick Weiner sent his weiner pics to random people.  She sent her whole body, while committing a felony for the whole world to see, including children.  So, I think she was worse than the former Weiner.

She didn't send it, apparently her husband posted the pics on a wife sharing subreddit on Reddit. Too funny if true.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, SC Tiger said:

I'm guessing it's rather like if you take naked pictues of your wife, and then someone steals the camera and posts them on the internet.  Yeah, you took the pictures but you never intended for them to be published.  

As to the SubReddit - I don't know.  I don't know if those pics were meant to be anonymous or what.

Her hubs apparently had a  reddit account and posted in a wife sharing subreddit. I've seen the post. It was from an account he's had a long time and hardly used. There is nothing that would indicate it was Katie Hill unless you knew . her well or her aide.

 

The aide is not attractive except in the hair brushing photo, she looks much better than normal.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/28/2019 at 8:21 AM, Moshe said:

And she is out of there!  Dick Weiner sent his weiner pics to random people.  She sent her whole body, while committing a felony for the whole world to see, including children.  So, I think she was worse than the former Weiner.

 

Only you would think she’s worse than a kid diddler. 

 

 

I can’t believe I’m gonna say this, but I prefer when you lie about things you never did in the BP. 

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, AK_Stick said:

 

Only you would think she’s worse than a kid diddler. 

 

 

I can’t believe I’m gonna say this, but I prefer when you lie about things you never did in the BP. 

In essence she is.  She put her body out to the general public while committing a felony.  I guess, you don't realize how many kids are tech savvy these days?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SarahMcGlocklan said:

It is gross that you think the exploitation of little girls isn’t a big deal.  Yikes.  

She is exploiting young girls and boys by exposing her body to them as a whole.  That is complete and total child abuse.  She might as well have flashed every boy and girl in the United States with an I-phone.  That would be most of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Eric locked this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Please Donate To TBS

    Please donate to TBS.
    Your support is needed and it is greatly appreciated.
×
×
  • Create New...