Jump to content

Katie Hill (Dem from California) - Hoo boy......


SC Tiger
 Share

Recommended Posts

23 hours ago, michael_b said:

She didn't send it, apparently her husband posted the pics on a wife sharing subreddit on Reddit. Too funny if true.

Every perv politician pleads their innocence.  Even Weiner did, until he could no longer deny it.  Pervs can be female as well.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SarahMcGlocklan said:

Is everything ok at home?  

Fine.  I just have a broader knowledge of criminals than you do.  I have interviewed female inmates.  The most common crime is child molestation/and or murder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Moshe said:

In essence she is.  She put her body out to the general public while committing a felony.  I guess, you don't realize how many kids are tech savvy these days?

The essence is she hurt no one by smoking weed and having consensual sexual with adults. 

 

Youre saying thats worse than a known kiddie diddler.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, AK_Stick said:

The essence is she hurt no one by smoking weed and having consensual sexual with adults. 

 

Youre saying thats worse than a known kiddie diddler.

She violated Schedule IV of the DEA, and she put pornography out to the general public, which public lewdness.  No, different if she ran down the past every place in the United States, flashing everyone with a bong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Moshe said:

Fine.  I just have a broader knowledge of criminals than you do.  I have interviewed female inmates.  The most common crime is child molestation/and or murder.

That’s funny. Women are less likely to commit violent crimes than males, and child molestation and/or murder is not the leading charges that they’re imprisoned for.....

 

I would think a jailer, errrr I mean border patrol SF bandito ICE superstar would atleast know what the leading crimes a woman would be jailed for might be. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Moshe said:

She violated Schedule IV of the DEA, and she put pornography out to the general public, which public lewdness.  No, different if she ran down the past every place in the United States, flashing everyone with a bong.

 

Putting photos on Reddit (if she even did it herself) does not equate to public lewdness. 

For an acclaimed “FLEO” you seem to really not know the law. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, AK_Stick said:

That’s funny. Women are less likely to commit violent crimes than males, and child molestation and/or murder is not the leading charges that they’re imprisoned for.....

 

I would think a jailer, errrr I mean border patrol SF bandito ICE superstar would atleast know what the leading crimes a woman would be jailed for might be. 

I would suspect you would completely in the dark considering your Supreme Court:

https://mustreadalaska.com/ak-supreme-court-sides-with-sex-offenders/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Moshe said:

Fine.  I just have a broader knowledge of criminals than you do.  I have interviewed female inmates.  The most common crime is child molestation/and or murder.

Then why do you post information that a simple google search would show to be patently false?  The most common violent crime committed by women is assault.  Females commit less than a thousand murders per year.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, AK_Stick said:

 

Putting photos on Reddit (if she even did it herself) does not equate to public lewdness. 

For an acclaimed “FLEO” you seem to really not know the law. 

You must have bumped your head, anyone with a computer or an I-phone could view it, including most tech savvy kids in the United States.  But, then again Bill Clinton raped under aged kids with his "suicided" friend, and he doesn't have to register anywhere.  But, I guess all politicians get a pass?  Or, are you blind to the fact that women rape children?  How many teacher child relationships have you seen?  It you were paying attention, several.  There is no gender distinction when it comes to deviant behavior.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SarahMcGlocklan said:

Then why do you post information that a simple google search would show to be patently false?  The most common violent crime committed by women is assault.  Females commit less than a thousand murders per year.   

Depends on which nationalities you are dealing with?  Try again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, AK_Stick said:

 

Putting photos on Reddit (if she even did it herself) does not equate to public lewdness. 

 

 I can't believe that any other conclusion is up for debate. 

 

It's certainly not "No, different if she ran down the past every place in the United States, flashing everyone with a bong. "

Edited by Dave514
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Dave514 said:

you're losing it. 

No, I am actually advocating gender equality in crime.  Rather than, the poor dear, she couldn't have possibly done that.  That is a 19th Century thought that women can not be as vicious as men.  That somehow they are the weaker sex, and anything deviant they do, is somehow not their fault because they are more a more frail sex.  My wife has a friend who went from model looking to body builder.  She could whoop every man's ass in this forum, mine included.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Moshe said:

No, I am actually advocating gender equality in crime.  Rather than, the poor dear, she couldn't have possibly done that.  That is a 19th Century thought that women can not be as vicious as men.  That somehow they are the weaker sex, and anything deviant they do, is somehow not their fault because they are more a more frail sex.  My wife has a friend who went from model looking to body builder.  She could whoop every man's ass in this forum, mine included.

I am now the idiot for responding to this as if it was a rational argument rooted in actual reality.  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SarahMcGlocklan said:

I am now the idiot for responding to this as if it was a rational argument rooted in actual reality.  

Well, that is the attitude portrayed here.  She couldn't have possibly do that?  Then if she was so innocent, why resign? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Moshe said:

You must have bumped your head, anyone with a computer or an I-phone could view it, including most tech savvy kids in the United States.  But, then again Bill Clinton raped under aged kids with his "suicided" friend, and he doesn't have to register anywhere.  But, I guess all politicians get a pass?  Or, are you blind to the fact that women rape children?  How many teacher child relationships have you seen?  It you were paying attention, several.  There is no gender distinction when it comes to deviant behavior.

Any kid with an iPhone or internet access can also watch porn. But that doesn’t constitute public lewdness. 

 

I think you're off your meds again. Probably time for another consensual visit. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Moshe said:

Well, that is the attitude portrayed here.  She couldn't have possibly do that?  Then if she was so innocent, why resign? 

 

Go back to lying about things you never did in the BP, atleast those stories were entertaining. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, AK_Stick said:

Any kid with an iPhone or internet access can also watch porn. But that doesn’t constitute public lewdness. 

 

I think you're off your meds again. Probably time for another consensual visit. 

Again, your gender bias is showing.  Attacking the messenger rather than examining the facts, means you have none.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, AK_Stick said:

 

Go back to lying about things you never did in the BP, atleast those stories were entertaining. 

I don't have to lie about anything.  If you are concerned, PM the Big Giant Head, I sent him my proof.  Now, as far as proof for this argument, you have none.  That is why you would rather attack the messenger rather than the message.  At this point in the discussion, you proven you have nothing of benefit to discuss.   You are being irrational rather than logical.  Once you let your emotions overcome the argument, you prove yourself pointless for any logical discussion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Moshe said:

Again, your gender bias is showing.  Attacking the messenger rather than examining the facts, means you have none.

If I post nude photos of you on Reddit, is it the same as if you "ran down the past every place in the United States, flashing everyone"??

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Dave514 said:

If I post nude photos of you on Reddit, is it the same as if you "ran down the past every place in the United States, flashing everyone"??

 

If you post yourself nude for everyone who has that app on their phone, I am certain someone would be visiting you on short order.  The only reason she wasn't arrested, and quit, is because, frankly, that is the only punishment for a perv politician.  Bill Clinton is still running around.  Before MN elected a terrorist, they elected good old Al Franken, who sexually assaulted another woman.  He isn't in office, but he sure as hell isn't in jail.  If you can't grasp that perverted politicians aren't punished regardless of gender, you haven't been paying attention.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Eric locked this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Please Donate To TBS

    Please donate to TBS.
    Your support is needed and it is greatly appreciated.
×
×
  • Create New...