pipedreams Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 The Pennsylvania supreme court ruled on Friday that ballots must be counted even if the signature does not match that of the voter on file. “We conclude that the Election Code does not authorize or require county election boards to reject absentee or mail-in ballots during the canvassing process based on an analysis of a voter’s signature,” the state Supreme Court wrote in an opinion signed by six of the seven justices, five of which are Democrat appointees to the bench. The court is directing “the county boards of elections not to reject absentee or mail-in ballots for counting, computing, and tallying based on signature comparisons conducted by county election officials or employees, or as the result of third party challenges based on such comparisons.” https://bigleaguepolitics.com/the-fix-is-in-pennsylvania-supreme-court-rules-ballots-must-be-approved-even-if-signature-does-not-match-registered-voter/ 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
janice6 Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 35 minutes ago, pipedreams said: The Pennsylvania supreme court ruled on Friday that ballots must be counted even if the signature does not match that of the voter on file. “We conclude that the Election Code does not authorize or require county election boards to reject absentee or mail-in ballots during the canvassing process based on an analysis of a voter’s signature,” the state Supreme Court wrote in an opinion signed by six of the seven justices, five of which are Democrat appointees to the bench. The court is directing “the county boards of elections not to reject absentee or mail-in ballots for counting, computing, and tallying based on signature comparisons conducted by county election officials or employees, or as the result of third party challenges based on such comparisons.” https://bigleaguepolitics.com/the-fix-is-in-pennsylvania-supreme-court-rules-ballots-must-be-approved-even-if-signature-does-not-match-registered-voter/ This is the Democrats dream election. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricordo Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 Shameless. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swampfox762 Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 That's just BS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
janice6 Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 I could get a ballot from a previous tenant and sign my name to it along with my ballot and PA Supreme Court says they both have to be counted. How does the PA Supreme Court define voting fraud???????? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swampfox762 Posted October 29, 2020 Share Posted October 29, 2020 2 hours ago, janice6 said: I could get a ballot from a previous tenant and sign my name to it along with my ballot and PA Supreme Court says they both have to be counted. How does the PA Supreme Court define voting fraud???????? The Golden rule. Them that got the gold...make the rules. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now