Random Political/Social Posting

[pipedreams]

[railfancwb]

9 hours ago, pipedreams said:

I thought nooses were supposed to have 13 turns rather than 5. Tradition not necessity. 

[pipedreams]

[pipedreams]

1 minute ago, railfancwb said:

I thought nooses were supposed to have 13 turns rather than 5. Tradition not necessity. 

Due to global warming have to save energy.

[pipedreams]

[pipedreams]

[pipedreams]

[pipedreams]

[pipedreams]

It doesn't matter how much money you give, there is never anything left to show for it except exploding birth rates and the flooding of White countries with rapists and AIDS.

[pipedreams]

[pipedreams]

[pipedreams]

[pipedreams]

[Schmidt Meister]

Make sure you're wearing your mask while you read this:

(By order of Herr Fauci)

Documents from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) obtained by a taxpayer watchdog organization reveal that the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), led by Dr. Anthony Fauci, spent $1.68 million on unnecessary research that killed dozens of beagle puppies.Between October 2018 and February 2019, NIAID-funded research at SRI International involved force-feeding or injecting 44 beagle puppies aged 6-8 months old with an experimental drug before killing and dissecting them, according to documents obtained by White Coat Waste Project (WCW), a taxpayer watchdog organization with a focus on scientific research. The research, deemed unnecessary by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), cost taxpayers $1.68 million.The NIH documents stated the experiments were conducted “to provide data of suitable quality and integrity to support application to the U.S . Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and other regulatory agencies.” However, following reporting by the Daily Caller and others on previous WCW investigations, the FDA stated this summer it “does not mandate that human drugs be studied in dogs.” The SRI research involved cutting the dogs’ vocal cords so they could not bark, as well as experimentation on mice. (RELATED: NIH Spent $140 Million On Animal Testing In Foreign Countries Last Year, Watchdog Group Finds)“People are naming puppies after Anthony Fauci, but he’s actually dogs’ and taxpayers’ worst nightmare. From poisoning puppies here at home to funding gain-of-function experiments in China, the government’s highest paid employee has proven he can’t be trusted to spend taxpayer dollars responsibly,” WCW vice president of advocacy and public policy Justin Goodman said. “With NIH director Francis Collins retiring, Fauci should be the next one to go.”

https://dailycaller.com/2021/10/05/antony-fauci-niaid-white-coat-waste-anima-experiment-abuse/

 

 

[Schmidt Meister]

[pipedreams]

THERE ARE NO COINCIDENCES

 

[Swampfox762]

[Schmidt Meister]

This man doesn't have an ounce of loyalty or integrity in his entire body.

[Schmidt Meister]

[Schmidt Meister]

[Schmidt Meister]

This Is Politically Driven Rank Inflation 

Yes, the Public Health Service is one of the eight “uniformed services” but, notwithstanding the uniforms and its bureaucrats designated as “admirals,” it is not part of the “armed forces.”

The U.S. armed forces are the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, Coast Guard, and Space Force. The other two government departments in the category of “uniformed services” are the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Commissioned Officer Corps and the Public Health Services Commissioned Officer Corps. In addition to their Navy-like uniforms, these two also are headed by bureaucrats designated “admirals.”

Four-star is the highest rank in the U.S. military. Although nine five-star admirals and generals served in World War II, the five-star rank was retired upon the death of Gen. Omar Bradley in 1981, leaving four-star generals as the highest rank.

The four-star designation calls to mind such historical and accomplished military men as Admiral William Halsey Jr., who commanded the Pacific Fleet in the fight-to-the-death against Japan (and was promoted to five-star rank only after the end of the war), and such notables as Gen. George Patton, recipient of two distinguished service crosses for heroism in battle and the American commander most feared by the Germans in World War II.

Even Patton was a “mere” three-star general when he commanded the Third Army in its drive through Europe into the heart of Germany, and was only awarded his fourth star less than a month before the war’s end. Thus, while maneuvering his Third Army to relieve Bastogne during the Battle of the Bulge, Patton would have been outranked by now-Admiral Levine.

In short, promotion to the four-star level normally indicates decades of military service, often in dangerous and life-threatening circumstances, and military achievements of the highest order. Levine does not remotely merit any comparison with these or any of the other accomplished four-star officers, whether admirals or generals.

This Would Be Ridiculous If It Weren’t So Offensive

https://thefederalist.com/2021/10/25/how-the-rachel-levine-four-star-admiral-photo-op-will-damage-u-s-security/

[ChuteTheMall]

[ChuteTheMall]

[ChuteTheMall]

[ChuteTheMall]