pipedreams Posted August 5, 2021 Share Posted August 5, 2021 This is absolutely nuts this ever happened. Betcha you never heard or seen this truly momentous news in the Left-infested mainstream media. Why’s that? "Did you know that since 1982, the Republican Party had been legally prohibited from contesting elections due to suspected vote fraud, because of a legal agreement called the Consent Decree the GOP made with the Democrat Party? Finally, 36 years later, a judge has ended the agreement, freeing the Republican Party to ensure electoral integrity by investigating and pursuing suspected vote fraud." https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/end-of-1982-consent-decree-gop-finally-can-contest-vote-fraud-after-36-years/ "To put it bluntly, the Consent Decree in effect gave a carte blanche to the Democrat Party to commit vote fraud in every voting district across America that has, in the language of the Consent Decree, “a substantial proportion of racial or ethnic populations.” The term “substantial proportion” is not defined. Since 1982, the Consent Decree had been renewed every year by the original judge, Carter appointee District Judge Dickinson R. Debevoise, who, even after he retired, returned every year for the sole purpose of renewing his 1982 order for another year. Debevoise died in August 2015." 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
railfancwb Posted August 5, 2021 Share Posted August 5, 2021 So… why did the Republicans consent? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pipedreams Posted August 5, 2021 Author Share Posted August 5, 2021 2 minutes ago, railfancwb said: So… why did the Republicans consent? It was a lawsuit in New Jersey, however the Carter appointed Judge applied it to the whole country. Rather complicated depending on which site you read about it. The two parties agreed that “in the future, in all states and territories of the United States,” they would: refrain from undertaking any ballot security activities. Well that opened the door to ballot cheating. Anyway that's the way I see it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
railfancwb Posted August 5, 2021 Share Posted August 5, 2021 2 minutes ago, pipedreams said: It was a lawsuit in New Jersey, however the Carter appointed Judge applied it to the whole country. Rather complicated depending on which site you read about it. The two parties agreed that “in the future, in all states and territories of the United States,” they would: refrain from undertaking any ballot security activities. Well that opened the door to ballot cheating. Anyway that's the way I see it. So it wasn’t just the Panama Canal Carter gave away. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now