Random Political/Social Posting

[pipedreams]

 

[ChuteTheMall]

[pipedreams]

[ChuteTheMall]

[pipedreams]

[ChuteTheMall]

[pipedreams]

[pipedreams]

[ChuteTheMall]

[ChuteTheMall]

[ChuteTheMall]

[ChuteTheMall]

[pipedreams]

[Dric902]

Let’s set the way back machine to 2004. When John “war hero” Kerry (I just threw up in my mouth a little) was running against BushHitler.

https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2020/12/19/2004-kerry-election-fraud-2020-448604

For most of the world, the uncertainty didn’t last. Kerry conceded the next day, making a cordial call to Bush, after concluding that a recount in Ohio wouldn’t change the outcome of the race. But Freeman, then a research scholar at the University of Pennsylvania, remembers wondering, “How could this be?” He dug around for the exit poll numbers he had fleetingly seen on TV. Then he went down a rabbit hole of statistical analysis, in search of explanations for the Bush votes that seemed to have magically appeared. A week after the election, he shared a draft of his findings with colleagues, with the conclusion that “fraud was an unavoidable hypothesis.” His analysis wound up spreading widely, drawing thousands of responses from around the country: people who believed, as he did, that the election had been stolen.

Over the 16 years that followed the 2004 election, candidates have won and conceded; presidents have been inaugurated. But the loosely defined movement that launched back then has lived on. Most of its members are left-wing, though not all of them identify as Democrats. They’ve come to define their cause not around John Kerry’s rightful presidency, but around the idea of election integrity. Some are fixated on voter suppression; some subscribe to deep-state conspiracies about the manipulation of voting machines. What they share is a conviction that the 2004 election was a sham.

 

https://www.commondreams.org/views06/0601-34.htm

Like many Americans, I spent the evening of the 2004 election watching the returns on television and wondering how the exit polls, which predicted an overwhelming victory for John Kerry, had gotten it so wrong. By midnight, the official tallies showed a decisive lead for George Bush -- and the next day, lacking enough legal evidence to contest the results, Kerry conceded. Republicans derided anyone who expressed doubts about Bush's victory as nut cases in ''tinfoil hats,'' while the national media, with few exceptions, did little to question the validity of the election. The Washington Post immediately dismissed allegations of fraud as ''conspiracy theories,''(1) and The New York Times declared that ''there is no evidence of vote theft or errors on a large scale.''(2)

But despite the media blackout, indications continued to emerge that something deeply troubling had taken place in 2004. Nearly half of the 6 million American voters living abroad(3) never received their ballots -- or received them too late to vote(4) -- after the Pentagon unaccountably shut down a state-of-the-art Web site used to file overseas registrations.(5) A consulting firm called Sproul & Associates, which was hired by the Republican National Committee to register voters in six battleground states,(6) was discovered shredding Democratic registrations.(7) In New Mexico, which was decided by 5,988 votes,(8) malfunctioning machines mysteriously failed to properly register a presidential vote on more than 20,000 ballots.(9) Nationwide, according to the federal commission charged with implementing election reforms, as many as 1 million ballots were spoiled by faulty voting equipment -- roughly one for every 100 cast.(10)

 

the nuts don’t change, only the names and parties switch from time to time. 
Those who dont remember history......keep repeating the same crap.

 

.

 

 

 

 

[pipedreams]

[Swampfox762]

Edited January 27, 2021 by Swampfox762

[Swampfox762]

Edited January 27, 2021 by Swampfox762

[Swampfox762]

[ChuteTheMall]

[Swampfox762]

[Swampfox762]

[pipedreams]

[Swampfox762]

[Swampfox762]

[Swampfox762]