America Must Opt Out Of The World Health Organization’s Global Medical Tyranny

[pipedreams]

The experts could hide behind international law as they advocate economy-crushing lockdowns and forced vaccinations.

"The basic question is whether America should remain an integral part of the United Nations’ international health agency, given the new rules being proposed as well as a new WHO treaty. There are two main fears about the IHR’s new rules and the WHO treaty.

First, proposed changes to the International Health Regulations would convert recommendations into requirements. In May of 2024, 196 U.N. member nations will vote on the changes to the IHRs, with a simple majority required to approve them. At that point, each nation has 10 months to reject compliance with the changes. If a nation rejects the changes, it will still abide by the old rules.

Some conservatives who care about protecting national sovereignty see a danger in these updated IHRs, as they impose mandatory health and pandemic reporting, vaccinations, tracking, and more. These requirements would override national laws as well as state public health statutes.

Second, the new WHO pandemic treaty, also up for a vote in the U.N. in May 2024, would represent another assault on U.S. sovereignty and thus the self-governance of the American people.

Despite a false “fact-check” by The Associated Press that dismissed these concerns, page 23 of the proposed U.N. treaty says, “The Parties commit to … tackle false, misleading, misinformation or disinformation, including through promotion of international cooperation. In that regard, each Party is encouraged to … [manage] infodemics … including social media; [and] identify the prevalence and profiles of misinformation…”

What is an “infodemic”? The WHO defines it as “…too much information including false or misleading information in digital and physical environments during a disease outbreak.” The IHRs contain these concerning provisions, and the new WHO treaty operationalizes the mechanisms with funding and governance.

Now, with the “Twitter Files” revelations — the admission that the State Department used taxpayer funds to pay a British firm to suppress conservative news sites, including The Federalist, and a new California law (now blocked by the courts) that subjects doctors who spread “misinformation or disinformation” about Covid-19 to malpractice lawsuits and discipline — we can see how the experts intend to suppress infodemics.

These actions by themselves would be violations of the First Amendment, even if the experts were 100 percent correct. That time and emerging information have shown so many experts’ claims to be false make the unconstitutional enforcement that much worse."

https://thefederalist.com/2023/03/28/america-must-opt-out-of-the-world-health-organizations-global-medical-tyranny/\

"With what we know today, the U.S. should stay away from the WHO — not because the Chinese control it, but because We the People do not."