TBO Posted September 4, 2019 Share Posted September 4, 2019 California’s Newsom signs bill allowing citizen to refuse to help a police officer https://www.foxnews.com/politics/californias-newsom-signs-bill-allowing-citizen-to-refuse-to-help-a-police-officer Sent from my Jack boot using Copatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
janice6 Posted September 4, 2019 Share Posted September 4, 2019 8 hours ago, TBO said: California’s Newsom signs bill allowing citizen to refuse to help a police officer https://www.foxnews.com/politics/californias-newsom-signs-bill-allowing-citizen-to-refuse-to-help-a-police-officer Sent from my Jack boot using Copatalk So, now in California, it's the law. Us against them. Many define this as anarchy. It's pathetic that the law says that you don't have to help those that are honor bound to help you. The only thing left is to permit open violence on LEO's. this is liberal government setting every one against everyone else. Shameful!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
minervadoe Posted September 4, 2019 Share Posted September 4, 2019 Newsom has no scruples. He behaves like a mindless populist doing only things that contribute to mob rule. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dric902 Posted September 4, 2019 Share Posted September 4, 2019 From the story: The Sacramento Bee reported that the old law, the California Posse Comitatus Act of 1872, was common in the country’s early days, but Sen. Bob Hertzberg, a Los Angeles Democrat who sponsored the bill, called the old law a “vestige of a bygone era." The law was employed to help catch runaway slaves, the report said. somebody explain to me how that 1872 law was employed to return runaway slaves when the Civil War ended in 1865 . 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
janice6 Posted September 4, 2019 Share Posted September 4, 2019 1 hour ago, Dric902 said: From the story: The Sacramento Bee reported that the old law, the California Posse Comitatus Act of 1872, was common in the country’s early days, but Sen. Bob Hertzberg, a Los Angeles Democrat who sponsored the bill, called the old law a “vestige of a bygone era." The law was employed to help catch runaway slaves, the report said. somebody explain to me how that 1872 law was employed to return runaway slaves when the Civil War ended in 1865 . Any excuse for the ignorant liberal. Typical politician. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
minervadoe Posted September 5, 2019 Share Posted September 5, 2019 5 hours ago, janice6 said: Any excuse for the ignorant liberal. Typical politician. He's a California Senator, ergo he is full of ****. I used https://duckduckgo.com/ to find a link to the law: https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=PEN§ionNum=150 Quote Penal Code - PEN PART 1. OF CRIMES AND PUNISHMENTS [25 - 680] ( Part 1 enacted 1872. ) TITLE 7. OF CRIMES AGAINST PUBLIC JUSTICE [92 - 186.34] ( Title 7 enacted 1872. ) CHAPTER 7. Other Offenses Against Public Justice [142 - 181] ( Chapter 7 enacted 1872. ) 150. Every able-bodied person above 18 years of age who neglects or refuses to join the posse comitatus or power of the county, by neglecting or refusing to aid and assist in taking or arresting any person against whom there may be issued any process, or by neglecting to aid and assist in retaking any person who, after being arrested or confined, may have escaped from arrest or imprisonment, or by neglecting or refusing to aid and assist in preventing any breach of the peace, or the commission of any criminal offense, being thereto lawfully required by any uniformed peace officer, or by any peace officer described in Section 830.1, subdivision (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), or (f) of Section 830.2, or subdivision (a) of Section 830.33, who identifies himself or herself with a badge or identification card issued by the officer’s employing agency, or by any judge, is punishable by a fine of not less than fifty dollars ($50) nor more than one thousand dollars ($1,000). (Amended by Stats. 1998, Ch. 760, Sec. 4. Effective January 1, 1999.) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
janice6 Posted September 5, 2019 Share Posted September 5, 2019 This is supposed to be our government, and our shared observance of the law. If we need help, we call the LEO. If he needs help, he calls those he serves. It's a shared duty but the LEO does it full time. We citizen's should help when help is needed. In an emergency there may not be time for a debate of the rationale for aiding a peace officer, it may be a life and death matter with minutes determining the outcome. I believe we should aid under any circumstances and talk about it afterwards. Too many believe that they should just sit there and watch someone else fight their war for their freedom, or fight their war against criminals. Get off your dead ass and help. If we aren't in this together this nation is doomed. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now