Jump to content

Borg warner

  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Borg warner

  1. I'm sorry, but you're missing the most important point. Why isn't our government pushing hybrid cars instead of all electric? That would make a lot more sense. Because hybrids make their own electricity and with the government shutting down coal fired plants at an alarming rate, and at the same time not building any new power plants in anticipation of a greatly increased demand once plug-in vehicles are mandated and better ones are developed, as long as they keep shutting down power plants and not building new ones, this will guarantee that there will be critical shortages of electricity resulting in a justification for "Emergency measures" and emergency powers And these people know that without creating creating a national disaster there can be no "Fundamental Transformation" of the USA until the existing country as we know it is completely destroyed which they are now accomplishing piecemeal. This "Fundamental Transformation" and Never letting a Crisis go to waste" is the Obama agenda from A to Z and the entire Biden/Harris administration are just a clueless passel of stooges carrying it out.
  2. It'd s good thing Our "Leaders" are planning ahead and building more power plants to charge all the new battery powered vehicles.
  3. Or Dick Cheney. And Liz Cheney just goes to show that the Guano never falls far from the Bat. But fortunately, chances for her upcoming re-election are not looking good. This from CNN. If this was from Breitbart or even Fox news, I'd say maybe they were being overly optimistic. But since it's CNN, I think they see it as inevitable that she will crash and burn. big time. Tuesday was a very bad political omen for Liz Cheney Chris Cillizza CNN news For Liz Cheney, Tuesday was a bad day for her political future. South Carolina Rep. Tom Rice, who, like Cheney, was one of 10 House Republicans who voted to impeach Donald Trump in the wake of the January 6, 2021, riot at the US Capitol, was crushed in a primary by state Rep. Russell Fry, who ran with the former President’s endorsement. “The ‘Impeacher’ was ousted without even a runoff,” Trump posted on his social media website Truth Social. “A GREAT night.” Rice is the latest Republican to watch their political future disappear in the wake of their vote to impeach Trump. Already, Reps. Adam Kinzinger of Illinois, John Katko of New York, Fred Upton of Michigan and Anthony Gonzalez of Ohio have announced their plans to retire at the end of this term – a decision forced on them, at least in part, on the negative reaction from their constituents to the impeachment vote. The five incumbents who have remained on the ballot this year face decidedly uncertain futures. Washington state GOP Reps. Dan Newhouse and Jaime Herrera Beutler face Trump-endorsed challengers in their August 2 primary fights. Ditto Michigan GOP Rep. Peter Meijer in the state’s August 2 primary. (California Rep. David Valadao is currently in second place in the 22nd Congressional District in the state, where the top two vote-getters regardless of party move on to the general election, following the June 7 primary. CNN has yet to project the second candidate who will advance in the race. Valadao is the only of the 10 who did not face a Trump-backed opponent.) But the race that has drawn the most attention – and money – from national Republicans and Trump is in Wyoming, where Cheney, the vice chair of the House select committee investigating January 6, faces a Republican primary against Harriet Hageman, who has the former President’s endorsement. Cheney’s vote to impeach Trump has already cost her a slot in House Republican leadership. Trump has repeatedly attacked her, saying of Cheney at a recent rally for Hageman in Wyoming: “She’s the face of the Washington swamp and the same failed foreign policy of the Clintons, Bushes, the Obamas, the Bidens and the entire sick political establishment.” Rice’s defeat sends a chilling message to Cheney – and the other remaining members of the Trump 10. Why? Because aside from his vote to impeach Trump, he was a down-the-line conservative and a committed backer of Trump’s policies. Rice has a 92% score from Heritage Action, the conservative think tank. According to FiveThirtyEight, Rice voted with the Trump agenda 94% of the time. 94%! What those numbers make clear is that Rice lost on Tuesday – and lost badly – for one reason and one reason only: He voted to impeach Trump. The rest of his decidedly conservative – and pro-Trump – record didn’t matter. Voters decided that he was not conservative enough solely because of the impeachment vote. Which is very bad news for Cheney, who is basing her re-election campaign on the idea that while she and Trump don’t see eye to eye on impeachment and January 6, she is the sort of conservative who Wyoming voters have consistently sent to Congress. (For what it’s worth, Cheney has an 87% rating from Heritage and voted with the Trump agenda nearly 93% of the time, per FiveThirtyEight.) The simple fact is that, at least based on what we know now, voting to impeach Trump over January 6 is totally disqualifying in the eyes of Republican voters. That doesn’t mean that all of the remaining Trump 10 will lose, but it sure doesn’t look good for them.
  4. I agree for the most part thant many people are either born that way or they aren't. Some people are less literally minded (Left brain Right brain?) and see beyond the physical and have a sense of the spiritual and some people just don't, but on the other hand, many people change throughout the course of their lives as the result of different experiences. My two brothers and I all had the same religious upbringing and both our parents were religious. However, I'm the only one of the 3 brothers who's always been religious but I've also had experiences during my life including near death experiences, that confirm my belief that there is something beyond the physical realm and that not everything can be known or explained. I don't condemn or look down on anyone who isn't religious but I have a lot more respect for someone who is agnostic and admits that they don't know if there is a higher power or not, than I do for someone who is a dedicated atheist who claims to know with absolute certainty that there is no such thing. I've also been brought up to respect other people's religion and have met some impressive and very sincere people of different faiths.
  5. I lived in L.A from 1959 to to 1969 when I went int the military and it was a great place to live. from 1974 to 1975 I lived in the SF Bay Area but moved back to L.A. and it was still nice. Then the city elected Tom Bradly Mayor and he made L.A the first sanctuary city in the country and the city became overcrowded with illegals and I watched things go downhill from there as the Democrats took over the entire state and destroyed it in every way imaginable. I moved out of there in 1998 and will never go back. I don't even want to see how bad it's become.
  6. My parents bought a GE refrigerator in 1947 the year I was born. They had that refrigerator for ten years and we moved across the country from New York to Southern California with it and had it in a house we rented for a year. Then we bought a new house and they got a new refrigerator and moved the GE into the garage. Then about 20 years later they moved from southern California to northern California and took eh GE with them for the garage refrigerator and left the other refrigerator behind. The lived there for about ten years until they were in their 80's And I was in my 60's (same age as the refrigerator) and left the GE behind because thy were moving into an assisted living facility. The people that bought the house hauled the old GE to the dump because it used too much electricity but if they had kept it, it would still be running today. It ran almost constantly 24-7-365 for over 60 years.
  7. No Problem. I just make sure he takes mine off the grille first.
  8. Those boys will have that story to tell their grandchildren.
  9. The Sovietization of American Life Behind all our disasters there looms an ideology, a creed that ignores cause and effect in the real world—without a shred of concern for the damage done to those outside the nomenklatura. no·men·kla·tu·ra noun: nomenklatura (in the former Soviet Union) a list of influential posts in government and industry to be filled by Communist Party appointees. By Victor Davis Hanson June 5, 2022 One day historians will look back at the period beginning with the COVID lockdowns of spring 2020 through the midterm elections of 2022 to understand how America for over two years lost its collective mind and turned into something unrecognizable and antithetical to its founding principles. “Sovietization” is perhaps the best diagnosis of the pathology. It refers to the subordination of policy, expression, popular culture, and even thought to ideological mandates. Ultimately such regimentation destroys a state since dogma wars with and defeats meritocracy, creativity, and freedom. Experts become sycophantic. They mortgage their experience and talent to ideology—to the point where society itself regresses. The law is no longer blind and disinterested, but adjudicates indictment, prosecution, verdict, and punishment on the ideology of the accused. Eric Holder is held in contempt of Congress and smiles; Peter Navarro is held in contempt of Congress and is hauled off in cuffs and leg-irons. James Clapper and John Brennan lied under oath to Congress—and were rewarded with television contracts; Roger Stone did the same and a SWAT team showed up at his home. Andrew McCabe made false statements to federal investigators and was exempt. A set-up George Papadopoulos went to prison for a similar charge. So goes the new American commissariat. Examine California and ask a series of simple questions. Why does the state that formerly served as a model to the nation regarding transportation now suffer inferior freeways while its multibillion-dollar high-speed rail project remains an utter boondoggle and failure? Why was its safe and critically needed last-remaining nuclear power plant scheduled for shutdown (and only recently reversed) as the state faced summer brownouts? Why did its forests go up in smoke predictably each summer, as its timber industry and the century-old science of forest management all but disappeared from the state? Why do the state’s criminals so often evade indictment, and if convicted are often not incarcerated—or are quickly paroled? Why are its schools’ test scores dismal, its gasoline the nation’s highest-priced, and the streets of its major cities fetid and dangerous—in a fashion not true 50 years ago or elsewhere today? In a word, the one-party state is Sovietized. Public policy is no longer empirical but subservient to green, diversity, equity, and inclusion dogmas—and detached from the reality of daily middle-class existence. Decline is ensured once ideology governs problem-solving rather than time-tested and successful policymaking. In a similar fashion, the common denominator in Joe Biden’s two years of colossal failures is Soviet-like edicts of equity, climate change, and neo-socialist redistribution that have ensured (for the non-elite, in any event) soaring inflation, unaffordable energy, rampant crime, and catastrophic illegal immigration. Playing the role of Pravda, Biden and his team simply denied things were bad, relabeled failure as success, and attacked his predecessor and critics as various sorts of counterrevolutionaries. Biden rejected commonsense, bipartisan policies that in the past kept inflation low, energy affordable, crime controlled, and the border manageable. Instead, he superimposed leftist dogma on every decision, whose ideological purity, not real-life consequences for millions, was considered the measure of success. Entire professions have now nearly been lost to radical progressive ideology. Do we remember those stellar economists who swore at a time of Biden’s vast government borrowing, increases in the monetary supply, incentivizing labor non-participation, and supply chain interruptions that there was no threat of inflation? Were they adherents of ideological “modern monetary theory”? Did they ignore their own training and experience in fealty to progressive creeds? What about the Stanford doctors who signed a groupthink letter attacking their former colleague, Dr. Scott Atlas, because he questioned the orthodoxies of Dr. Anthony Fauci and the state bureaucracies—who we now know hid their own involvement with channeling funding to deadly gain-of-function research in Wuhan? Did they reject his views on empirical grounds and welcome a give-and-take shared inquiry—or simply wish to silence an ideological outlier and advisor to a despised counterrevolutionary? Or how about the 50 retired intelligence “experts” who swore that Hunter Biden’s laptop was not genuine but likely Russian disinformation? Did they really rely on hundreds of years of collective expertise to adjudicate the laptop or did they simply wish to be rewarded with something comparable to a “Hero of Woke America” award? Or what about the 1,000 medical “professionals” who claimed violating quarantine and protective protocols for Black Lives Matter demonstrations was vital for the mental health of the protestors? Or the Princeton creators of a video identifying Jonathan Katz as a sort of public enemy for the crime of stating that racial discrimination of any sort was toxic? There can be no expertise under Sovietization; everything and everyone serves ideology. Our military—especially its four-star generals, current and retired—parroted perceived ideologically correct thought. Repeating party lines about diversity, white supremacy, and climate change are far more relevant for career advancement than proof of prior effective military leadership in battle. The ultimate trajectory of a woke military was the fatal disgrace in Afghanistan. Ideologues in uniform kept claiming that the humiliating skedaddle was a logistical success and that misguided bombs that killed innocents were called a “righteous strike.” Afghanistan all summer of 2021 was to be Joe Biden’s successful model of a graduated withdrawal in time for a 20th-anniversary commemoration of 9/11—until it suddenly wasn’t. Pentagon decision-making increasingly privileges race, gender, sexuality, and green goals over traditional military lethality and effectiveness—a fact known to all who are up for promotion, retention, or disciplinary action. How predictable it was that the United States fled Kabul, abandoning not just billions of dollars worth of sophisticated weapons to terrorists, but also with Pride flags flying, George Floyd murals on public walls, and gender studies initiatives being carried out in the military ranks. Ask yourself: if a general during the Afghanistan debacle had brilliantly organized a sustainable and defensible corridor around Bagram Airfield but was known to be skeptical of Pentagon efforts to address climate change and diversity would he be praised or reviled? The elite universities in their single-minded pursuit of wokeness are ironically doing America a great favor. For a long time, their success was due to an American fetishization of brand names. But now, most privately accept that a BA from Princeton or Harvard is no longer an indication of acquired knowledge, mastery of empiricism, or predictive of inductive thinking over deductive dogmatism. Instead, we now understand, various lettered certificates serve as stamps for career advancement—proof either of earlier high-school achievement that merely won the bearer admission to the select, or confirmation that the graduate possesses the proper wealth, contacts, athletic ability, race, gender, or sexuality to be invited to the club. Universities’ abandonment of test scores and diminution of grades—replaced by “community service” and race, gender, and sexuality criteria—has simply clarified the bankruptcy of the entire higher education industry. Our “diversity statements” required for hiring at many universities are becoming comparable to Soviet certifications of proper Marxist-Leninist fidelity. Like the children of Soviet Party apparatchiks, privileged university students now openly attack faculty whose reading requirements or lectures supposedly exude scents of “colonialism” or “imperialism” or “white supremacy.” Faculty increasingly fear offering merit evaluation, in terror that diversity commissars might detect in their grading an absence of reparatory race or gender appraisals. The result is still more public cynicism about higher education because it is apparent that the goal is to graduate with a stamp from Yale or Stanford that ensures prestige, success, and ideological correctness—on the supposition that few will ever worry exactly what or how one did while enrolled. We have our own Emmanuel Goldsteins who, we are told, deserve our three minutes of hate for counterrevolutionary thought and practice. Donald Trump earned the enmity of the CIA, the FBI, the Justice Department, and the IRS. Now Elon Musk and his companies are suddenly the targets of the progressive state, including repartees from the president himself. To vent, the popular Soviet directs its collective enmity at a Dave Chappelle or Bill Maher, progressives who exhibit the occasional counterrevolutionary heresy. Cabinet secretaries ignore their duties—somewhat understandable given their resumes never explained their appointments. What binds a Pete Buttigieg, Alejandro Mayorkas, and Jennifer Granholm is not expertise in transportation, border security, or energy independence but allegiance to an entire menu of woke policies that are often antithetical to their own job descriptions. “Diversity,” “equity,” and “inclusion” started out as mandated proportional representation as defined by the state allotting spoils of coveted admissions, hiring, honors, and career advancement by race and gender percentages in the general population. The subtext was that federal and state governments imported and incorporated largely academic theories that alleged any disequilibrium was due to bias. More specifically, racial and sexual prejudices were to be exposed and punished by morally superior castes—in politics, the bureaucracy, and the courts. There was never any interest in detailing how particular individuals were personally harmed by the system or by the “other,” which explains the Left’s abhorrence of racially blind, class-based criteria to establish justified need. In the last five years, American Sovietization has descended into reparatory representation. Due to prior collective culpability of whites, heterosexuals, and males, marginalized self-defined groups of victims must now be “overrepresented” in admissions, hiring, and visibility in popular culture As the Soviets and Maoists discovered—and as was true of the Jacobins, National Socialists, and cultural Marxists—once radical ideology defines success, then life in general becomes anti-meritocratic. The public privately equates awards and recognition with political fealty, not actual achievement. Were recent Netflix productions reflections of merit or ideological criteria governing race and gender? Do the Emmys, Tonys, or Oscars convey recognition of talent, or of adherence to progressive agendas of diversity, equity, and inclusion? Does a Pulitzer Prize, a Ford Foundation grant, or a MacArthur award denote talent and achievement or more often promote diversity, equity, and inclusion narratives? Where does woke Sovietization end once accountability vanishes and ideology masks incompetence and malfeasance? We are starting to see the final denouement with missing baby formula, epidemics of shootings and hate crimes, train-robbings reminiscent of the Wild West in Los Angeles, Tombstonesque shoot-up Saturday nights in Chicago, spiking electricity rates and brownouts, $7 a gallon diesel fuel, unaffordable and scarce meat, and entire industries from air travel to home construction that simply no longer work. Everyone knows that the status of our homeless population in Los Angeles or San Francisco is medieval, dangerous, and unhealthy. And everyone knows that any serious attempt to remedy the situation would cause one to be labeled an apostate, counterrevolutionary, and enemy of the people. So, like good Eastern Europeans of the Warsaw Pact in the 1960s, we mutter one thing under our breath, and nod another publicly. Behind all our disasters there looms an ideology, a creed that ignores cause and effect in the real world—without a shred of concern for the damage done to those outside the nomenklatura.
  10. At first I couldn't read the logo on the hub cap.
  11. I've never seen another cucaracha since I moved from California to Eastern Washington state 20years ago.
  12. In California, bee's can be fishes, fishes can be birds, boys can be girls, girls can be boys, foreign nationals can be citizens, and along with dead people and felons they can vote for the people who make the laws that say all this is so. It's never-neverland and What-the-fk-everland all rolled into one.
  13. If I mess it up. I can clean it up. But usually I wait until the passenger side floorboard gets filled up to the level of the seat and then I get out a large trash bag and clean out the floor and the seat and maybe do a little detailing,
  • Create New...