fortyofforty Posted July 13, 2018 Share Posted July 13, 2018 Here's a point I haven't heard anyone make: Peter Strzok is claiming that, although he was biased against President Trump and in favor of Hillary Clinton, he would NEVER have allowed it to influence his actions. NEVER. Not one time. Well, haven't we all been lectured by the left about bias, lately? Haven't we all been lectured by the left about bias, not just the bias we can see but IMPLICIT BIAS? Yes, implicit bias. That bias that you might not think you have, or might think does not impact your behavior but actually does. How can the left defend Strzok who was clearly biased, in light of the recent mandatory Implicit Bias training forced on all DOJ employees? Department of Justice Announces New Department-Wide Implicit Bias Training for Personnel 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dric902 Posted July 13, 2018 Share Posted July 13, 2018 Cause it is not yet criminal to have an opinion while performing your duties Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fortyofforty Posted July 14, 2018 Author Share Posted July 14, 2018 15 minutes ago, Dric902 said: Cause it is not yet criminal to have an opinion while performing your duties But based on what is stated DOJ policy, it is improper to hold such rabid bias and work on cases involving the people about whom you hold such rabid beliefs, and assigning that same guy to work in every important aspect of two major political investigations should have been prevented. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crockett Posted July 14, 2018 Share Posted July 14, 2018 You nailed it. It is great to see that the DOJ finally acts on this catastrophic imbalance, and I hope it is in time. But the truth is, all voters need such a training, in order to get rid of the bias they get shoved up their assed by the agenda driven MSM. If you repeat a lie often enough, people will believe it. Joseph Goebbels The Nazi Propaganda Minister 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boogieman Posted July 14, 2018 Share Posted July 14, 2018 51 minutes ago, Dric902 said: Cause it is not yet criminal to have an opinion while performing your duties An opinion? These conspirators only held an opinion? Come on, not even you can believe that. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dric902 Posted July 14, 2018 Share Posted July 14, 2018 26 minutes ago, Boogieman said: An opinion? These conspirators only held an opinion? Come on, not even you can believe that. “Come on” is not evidence of a crime just a headline Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boogieman Posted July 14, 2018 Share Posted July 14, 2018 1 minute ago, Dric902 said: “Come on” is not evidence of a crime just a headline Wow...just wow. I mean other than those incriminating texts prove the wrong doing. He fully admits it. Haven't you been watching? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dric902 Posted July 14, 2018 Share Posted July 14, 2018 1 hour ago, fortyofforty said: But based on what is stated DOJ policy, it is improper to hold such rabid bias and work on cases involving the people about whom you hold such rabid beliefs, and assigning that same guy to work in every important aspect of two major political investigations should have been prevented. So you can only investigate the people you agree with? You can only investigate Trump if you voted for Trump? No bias there right? it is improper to let your bias influence the facts or conduct of an investigation. And “rabid” is an opinion of the degree of opinion. Who defines the level of “rabid” required to recuse yourself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dric902 Posted July 14, 2018 Share Posted July 14, 2018 Just now, Boogieman said: Wow...just wow. I mean other than those incriminating texts prove the wrong doing. He fully admits it. Haven't you been watching? Texts are not conspiracy. incrimination is not evidence of anything but that he is an *******. Let’s look at some of your texts. What would they “prove” under your standard of evidence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boogieman Posted July 14, 2018 Share Posted July 14, 2018 11 minutes ago, Dric902 said: Texts are not conspiracy. incrimination is not evidence of anything but that he is an *******. Let’s look at some of your texts. What would they “prove” under your standard of evidence. The texts prove the attempted undermining of the election and the Presidency. Haven't you been watching? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crockett Posted July 14, 2018 Share Posted July 14, 2018 11 minutes ago, Dric902 said: Texts are not conspiracy. incrimination is not evidence of anything but that he is an *******. Let’s look at some of your texts. What would they “prove” under your standard of evidence. Criminal or not, do you remember the FBI motto? Fidelity, Bravery, Integrity. He failed in all 3 categories, and lost the trust of the public, in a public position. He is a disgrace for the FBI, the country, and the people. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dric902 Posted July 14, 2018 Share Posted July 14, 2018 7 minutes ago, Boogieman said: The texts prove the attempted undermining of the election and the Presidency. Haven't you been watching? No, they don’t. They prove that he’s a democrap. who are these political angels that you seem to think work for the government? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boogieman Posted July 14, 2018 Share Posted July 14, 2018 1 minute ago, Dric902 said: No, they don’t. They prove that he’s a democrap. who are these political angels that you seem to think work for the government? So his full admissions aren't enough? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dric902 Posted July 14, 2018 Share Posted July 14, 2018 8 minutes ago, crockett said: Criminal or not, do you remember the FBI motto? Fidelity, Bravery, Integrity. He failed in all 3 categories, and lost the trust of the public, in a public position. He is a disgrace for the FBI, the country, and the people. He is a despicable person. Who gets to determine the fidelity, bravery, and integrity. again, who are these angels that some of you seem to think work for the government? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dric902 Posted July 14, 2018 Share Posted July 14, 2018 Just now, Boogieman said: So his full admissions aren't enough? What conspiracy to violate the integrity of the election or the undermining of the presidency did he admit to? you mean he voted for Hillary? That makes him an idiot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dric902 Posted July 14, 2018 Share Posted July 14, 2018 I’m glad I don’t live under the judicial system that some of you seem to believe in Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crockett Posted July 14, 2018 Share Posted July 14, 2018 2 minutes ago, Dric902 said: He is a despicable person. Who gets to determine the fidelity, bravery, and integrity. again, who are these angels that some of you seem to think work for the government? In his position I - as well as most - EXPECT integrity. Have you forgotten what integrity stands for? I marked all parts he failed in miserably: in·teg·ri·ty noun: integrity 1. the quality of being honest and having strong moral principles; moral uprightness. "he is known to be a man of integrity" synonyms: honesty, probity, rectitude, honor, good character, principle(s), ethics, morals, righteousness, morality, virtue, decency, fairness, scrupulousness, sincerity, truthfulness, trustworthiness "I never doubted his integrity" antonyms: dishonesty 2. the state of being whole and undivided. "upholding territorial integrity and national sovereignty" synonyms: unity, unification, coherence, cohesion, togetherness, solidarity "the integrity of the federation" antonyms: division Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boogieman Posted July 14, 2018 Share Posted July 14, 2018 13 minutes ago, Dric902 said: What conspiracy to violate the integrity of the election or the undermining of the presidency did he admit to? you mean he voted for Hillary? That makes him an idiot. Did you even listen to his admissions? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dric902 Posted July 14, 2018 Share Posted July 14, 2018 You are laughably naive. You realize that people work for the government, right Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crockett Posted July 14, 2018 Share Posted July 14, 2018 You might want to pull up the meaning of 'accountability' as well. People had enough of this swamp bullshit. End of story. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dric902 Posted July 14, 2018 Share Posted July 14, 2018 1 minute ago, Boogieman said: Did you even listen to his admissions? Oh yeah, execute him now for texting his girlfriend. He said “we” so obviously there is a great cabal of deep state swamp traitors working in concert to undermine the Great and Powerful Trump. Fire up the wood chipper!!!!!!! what exactly did he admit to that you think is a chargeable crime? Not opinion, not spin, not “you just know” but actual criminal actions? Not assumed, not incriminated, not implied, not indicated. Actual criminal code violations. he admitted to being a political bitch. So? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boogieman Posted July 14, 2018 Share Posted July 14, 2018 6 minutes ago, Dric902 said: You are laughably naive. You realize that people work for the government, right Here's an admission of obstruction of justice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boogieman Posted July 14, 2018 Share Posted July 14, 2018 Just now, Dric902 said: Oh yeah, execute him now for texting his girlfriend. He said “we” so obviously there is a great cabal of deep state swamp traitors working in concert to undermine the Great and Powerful Trump. Fire up the wood chipper!!!!!!! what exactly did he admit to that you think is a chargeable crime? Not opinion, not spin, not “you just know” but actual criminal actions? Not assumed, not incriminated, not implied, not indicated. Actual criminal code violations. he admitted to being a political bitch. So? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dric902 Posted July 14, 2018 Share Posted July 14, 2018 3 minutes ago, crockett said: You might want to pull up the meaning of 'accountability' as well. People had enough of this swamp bull****. End of story. accountability.......for what? Not agreeing with you? swamp bullshit is a felony? What charges do you file for being an *******? “You have been found guilty of being a swamp bullshit *******, you admit to texting **** to your girlfriend and not likening the guy you investigated, even if it didn’t make any difference.............death!!!” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dric902 Posted July 14, 2018 Share Posted July 14, 2018 5 minutes ago, Boogieman said: Here's an admission of obstruction of justice. “Because they weren’t relevant” ”to the focus of the investigation” damn, hang him!!!!!!! Thats not obstruction . . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now