Jump to content

Don't Tase Me Bro! Really......Don't!


Maser
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, holyjohnson said:

i`m Okay with that Ending..

 

Cops in the video obviously didn't know he was carrying gas in his backpack, so I'm not faulting them.  However, I have seen a few other vids where cops see someone pouring gas on themselves because they're suicidal and threaten to light themselves up if the cops come any closer and what do the cops do?  They tase the guy and wonder why he caught on fire.  In a case like that, qualified immunity needs to go out the window and cops should be charged with intentional homicide because I find it very hard to believe that someone could be that stupid to think it would be okay to tase someone who is clearly very flammable. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Maser said:

 

Cumbustable propellant in the pepper spray?  I have seen some pressure cans list butane or propane as the propellant.  I don't know about pepper spray. Then ignited by the taser?

Does seem a bit much for a gas, more like a liquid.  What released the liquid?

Don't do the crime - Don't do the time! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, janice6 said:

Cumbustable propellant in the pepper spray?  I have seen some pressure cans list butane or propane as the propellant.  I don't know about pepper spray. Then ignited by the taser?

Don't do the crime - Don't do the time! 

 

2 minutes ago, holyjohnson said:

should they have used the sidearm instead?

The onus is on the criminal since the cop doesn't know what cumbustables the criminal may have, if any.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, janice6 said:

Cumbustable propellant in the pepper spray?  I have seen some pressure cans list butane or propane as the propellant.  I don't know about pepper spray. Then ignited by the taser?

Does seem a bit much for a gas, more like a liquid.  What released the liquid?

Don't do the crime - Don't do the time! 

 

By gas, I meant gasoline.  He had a container of gasoline in his backpack which either broke open after he jumped off the bike or like what's said in the video description, the taser probes poked through the container. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Maser said:

 

By gas, I meant gasoline.  He had a container of gasoline in his backpack which either broke open after he jumped off the bike or like what's said in the video description, the taser probes poked through the container. 

I didn't catch that he was carrying gasoline in the back pack.  I have a bad hearing problem so I guess it's due to that.  thanks for the clarification.  :cheers:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, janice6 said:

I didn't catch that he was carrying gasoline in the back pack.  I have a bad hearing problem so I guess it's due to that.  thanks for the clarification.  :cheers:

 

 

It's not said in the actual video, but rather in the video description.  When I first saw the vid when it was shown on a podcast, I had no clue what happened.  I was expecting the cop car chasing him to bump him off the road or something. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Maser said:

 

Cops in the video obviously didn't know he was carrying gas in his backpack, so I'm not faulting them.  However, I have seen a few other vids where cops see someone pouring gas on themselves because they're suicidal and threaten to light themselves up if the cops come any closer and what do the cops do?  They tase the guy and wonder why he caught on fire.  In a case like that, qualified immunity needs to go out the window and cops should be charged with intentional homicide because I find it very hard to believe that someone could be that stupid to think it would be okay to tase someone who is clearly very flammable. 

Anyone pouring gasoline on themselves has a death wish to start with, might say their looking for suicide by cop.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get tired of hearing, "They should have de-escalated the situation instead of tasing/shooting/sitting on him."  The videos don't show all the attempts to de-escalate before it was clear the nutter wasn't going to allow that.  Sometimes, people are too drunk, high, stupid, or crazy for verbal de-escalation to work.  And if faced with some drunk, high, stupid, or crazy person who wants to fight and is too irrational to feel any pain - tasing may be a better choice than going hands-on simply on the level of the number of people who will be injured (both people fighting, or just the idiot resisting).  Also, I don't mind Darwin awards going to people stupid enough to fill a backpack with gasoline, drive their motorcycle in a manner that endangers others, and fail to stop for the cops.  I mean, it would be nice if there were basic levels of common sense and human decency that were necessary to live long enough to reproduce.  JMHO, YMMV.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/22/2022 at 9:31 PM, holyjohnson said:

should they have used the sidearm instead?

armor-piercing incendary rounds for the win.  

Flamethrower Gif GIFs | Tenor

On 10/22/2022 at 9:49 PM, Maser said:

 

No, they should have used a tactic known as de-escalating the situation. 

:anim_rofl2: Yeah, clearly a job for a social justice warrior. :anim_lol:

 

6yoeyf.jpg

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Please Donate To TBS

    Please donate to TBS.
    Your support is needed and it is greatly appreciated.
×
×
  • Create New...