Jump to content

America's Four Star Problem


Gunboat1
 Share

Recommended Posts

https://www.theamericanconservative.com/americas-four-star-problem/

 

"Other problems are caused by secretaries of Defense whose priorities were too often been driven by the politics of apportioning money and technology to the “right people,” or social engineering, and far less to the ruthless pursuit of building forces that can fight. The Biden administration’s divisive, racially charged policies and “woke” LGBT agenda may be the worst of these given their impact on military morale, discipline, readiness, and recruiting."

This is a large part of why our Armed Forces are so completely and visibly screwed up.  We put far too many of the WRONG people in charge.  And we'd better get it unscrewed, pronto.  This will require a ruthless approach to ripping out the many PC princes and princesses, root and branch.  Bring back the fighters who aren't afraid to call bullshit on the idiotic policies of "Diversity Uber Alles."

 

  • Like 6
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, but the notion that they place them in all frontline units is a false mythology.  They are in reserve/ support roles except for one unit:  Caracal Battalion, and a few others assigned to the "Lions of Jordan" and the "Cheetah" battalions.  They are used as a dog and pony show to virtue signal how progressive they are.  Even in those battalions,  the women are kept as far from the action as possible,  and their performance has been decidedly mixed.  Although you wouldn't know that from reading the glowing, carefully cherry-picked PR press about them.

 

Everyone who supports women in combat and doesn't want to know the facts always brings up the Israeli army.  It's a myth.  And the Israeli army hasn't, isn't, and won't be engaged with a first-world peer enemy since the integration of women into combat units.  They are hell on wheels against rock-throwing Palestinian hooligans, though.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Batesmotel said:

Clinton gutter the warriors from the officer corps. It has been progressively degraded from there. 

It goes back even further.

Jimma Carter hollowed out the armed forces.

Harold Brown was a geek, not a warrior, who advocated replacing actual warriors with technology.

A few years and hundreds of  billions later, no practical technology, few warriors. 

  • Like 1
  • Sad 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

there's nothing inherently wrong with women.  It's when you lower ANY standards of performance in order to include more of them that you have problems.  That's just stupid.  But then, the DIE crowd is inherently stupid, and is hellbent on taking the rest of us to hell with them when they go...

  • Like 6
  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Mrs.Cicero said:

there's nothing inherently wrong with women.  It's when you lower ANY standards of performance in order to include more of them that you have problems.  That's just stupid.  But then, the DIE crowd is inherently stupid, and is hellbent on taking the rest of us to hell with them when they go...

I tested for a Fire Dept in the early 80's. Several women applied so they lowered the standards for the physical agility testing. I was amazed at the number of guys that washed out anyway. Couldn't do the basic tasks. BTW, none of the chicks made it even with the lower standards.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Walt Longmire said:

I tested for a Fire Dept in the early 80's. Several women applied so they lowered the standards for the physical agility testing. I was amazed at the number of guys that washed out anyway. Couldn't do the basic tasks. BTW, none of the chicks made it even with the lower standards.

And that’s the problem-lowering the standards puts EVERYONE at greater risk. Not just the person that can only meet the lowered standards but not the original, higher ones.  And it drives me nuts that the politicians in charge don’t give a damn about this, but only care how “inclusive “ it makes them look when they vote for this kind of insanity.  (Rant/off)

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Please Donate To TBS

    Please donate to TBS.
    Your support is needed and it is greatly appreciated.
×
×
  • Create New...