Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1,641 Excellent

About PPQer

  • Rank
    Senior Member


  • Interests
    P99er "over there"

Recent Profile Visitors

483 profile views
  1. I wouldn't necessarily disagree, but I think with Trump at the helm, that's less likely to happen over C-19, but very possible in the future. As positive tests keep skyrocketing and deaths keep going down or holding steady, and more successful treatments being found, sooner or later, it's going to be obvious that C-19 has run it's course. If Trump wins in November, I think he'll fire Fauci (if he can) and all but call him a fraud. Which he is. But even Trump isn't immune to the media hysteria that would ensue if he did it before Nov 3. I just wish the President would assemble a panel of experts from the private sector, point out why he is, and then use their recommendations. I suspect the NIAID, CDC, and MSM would fight it tooth and nail.
  2. Who was it that said America is a dumpster fire and the world is laughing at US?
  3. If that is the case, what are all of those vaccines that are currently being tested? They can't be testing them if they haven't been developed yet...... Just to help you understand all of this a little better. "PHASE 3" means there have already been TWO PHASES of testing. Testing on potential vaccines that have been developed. Remember what your Jennay said...... Run Forest...... Ruuuuuunnnnnn........ https://www.webmd.com/lung/news/20200610/covid-19-latest-updates COVID-19 Vaccine: Latest Updates June 10, 2020 -- With more than 170 potential vaccines for COVID-19 under study, optimistic experts hope that a viable vaccine may be ready by the end of 2020. https://www.nydailynews.com/coronavirus/ny-coronavirus-moderna-vaccine-trial-delayed-20200702-g4oz2tsjtzc45b5vcv2r73zkmm-story.html Moderna delays Phase 3 trial for COVID-19 vaccine “Moderna has previously disclosed that the Phase 3 trial of its COVID-19 vaccine candidate mRNA-1273 is expected to begin in July. The trial is still expected to begin in July and we expect to be the first to start a Phase 3 trial,” read a company statement sent to the Daily News Thursday. “We have worked closesly with NIH/OWS to align on the final protocol in order to begin the trial on time.” https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/covid-19-vaccine-moderna-begin-final-human-trial-end-july-n1233788 COVID-19 vaccine: Promising results from Moderna's first trial as they aim to start final phase The phase 3 trial aims to answer the big question: Does the coronavirus vaccine work? July 14, 2020, 5:34 PM UTC / Updated July 14, 2020, 9:50 PM UTC By Sara G. Miller and Erika Edwards Moderna is aiming to begin its final phase of testing for its coronavirus vaccine July 27. The Cambridge, Massachusetts-based biotech company is the first in the U.S. to announce an estimated start date for phase 3 trials. https://www.statnews.com/2020/05/26/moderna-vaccine-candidate-trial-participant-severe-reaction/ He experienced a severe reaction to Moderna’s Covid-19 vaccine candidate. He’s still a believer MAY 26, 2020 Patients in clinical trials are usually faceless. But as the experimental Covid-19 vaccine being developed by Moderna Therapeutics has begun advancing through studies, it has found a much more visible advocate: trial volunteer Ian Haydon, a 29-year-old in Seattle. Haydon has spoken about the vaccine on CNN and CNBC. He even said he’d volunteer to be exposed to the novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, if researchers want to test to see if the vaccine was actually effective. But up until now he has left out a key detail: He is, apparently, one of three people in the trial who had a systemic adverse reaction to the vaccine. Twelve hours after receiving his second dose, he developed a fever of more than 103 degrees, sought medical attention, and, after being released from an urgent care facility, fainted in his home. He recovered within a day. He has not brought up the side effects previously, he said, out of “an abundance of caution.” “I understand that sharing the story, it’s going to be frightening to some people,” he said. “I hope that it doesn’t fuel any sort of general antagonism towards vaccines in general or towards even this vaccine.”
  4. A vaccine won't be effective, but it will be mandatory. It won't matter. They'll have solid treatments by then (dose pack with z pack and budesonide ) and the vaccine will be mostly for the at risk population. Which is why they have to keep the pandemic hysteria going. The most interesting part will be the endpoints the FDA puts on the trials, and how bad the vaccine will miss but still be approved.
  5. Justice delayed is justice denied.
  6. From TBO thread: https://uncoverdc.com/2020/07/15/a-scientific-look-at-the-mask-fallacy-and-why-were-told-to-wear-them/ From a doctor in the PRIVATE SECTOR.
  7. I hope the Karens here read that article. ETA: I think this doctor qualifies for the term PRIVATE SECTOR.
  8. PPQer

    Hot Sauce

    These are hot, but very flavorful.
  9. from the aforementioned private sector: https://www.redstate.com/michael_thau/2020/07/13/many-medical-experts-were-against-lockdowns-the-media-just-didnt-want-us-know/ Literally Thousands of Doctors and Scientists Have Come Out Against Fauci’s Lockdowns Including a Nobel Prize-Winning Biophysicist. The Media Just Doesn’t Want You to Know. As RedState’s very own Sister Toldjah reported earlier today, the doubts President Trump recently expressed about the wisdom of Dr. Fauci’s advice on COVID-19 have elicited a chorus of smug accusation from the usual suspects that he’s “ignoring the experts.” Sister Toldjah pointed out that it’s hard to know what their complaint even means given how often Fauci and other media-anointed authorities have done total 180s. But, even putting aside how their advice seems to change with the political winds, the idea that there’s some scientific consensus in favor of the extreme measures inflicted on us in response to COVID-19 couldn’t be further from the truth. Though you don’t hear their perspectives on CNN, countless scientists and doctors have tried to warn us not only that COVID-19 isn’t nearly as deadly as we’ve been led to believe; they’re also certain that the real threat to public health we’re facing is from the lockdowns. For example, though the establishment media has somehow failed to make it widely known, in May over 600 physicians from “all specialties and from all states” signed a public letter to President Trump describing, not COVID-19, but the lockdowns as a “mass casualty incident.” Since the letter first appeared, the number of doctors signing on has grown into the thousands. Their letter warns: Similarly, way back in April, two California emergency room physicians gave a press conference in which they rejected basically every single premise used to justify the lockdowns. Moreover, unlike Fauci, they actually gave detailed explanations of the reasons behind what they were saying rather than demanding blind obedience. Dr. Dan Erickson and Dr. Artin Massihi presented data from all across the world indicating that Fauci’s response to COVID-19 was completely out of proportion with the threat it posed. They also explained that isolating healthy people is an unheard-of response that violates the basic tenets of both microbiology and immunology. And, like the thousands of doctors who signed that letter to the president, they described in painful detail the disastrous public health consequences working emergency room physicians on the front lines are seeing every day as a result of these lockdowns. In a sign of how much our elites really care about following the science, Youtube banned the video of Dr. Erickson and Dr. Massihi’s press conference even though it not only featured medical experts fully explaining the science behind their conclusions; it was also posted by a local News channel. Fortunately, the video is still available on other platforms that don’t censor views contradicting the mainstream media’s official narratives. Some local news outlets have also acted like journalists instead of gatekeepers and given the public a chance to hear Dr. Erickson’s take. Nor are Erickson and Massihi by any means the only physicians who’ve tried to warn us that the lockdowns Fauci’s pushed have nothing to do with “following the science.” Some have even thus far managed to avoid YouTube censorship. much more at link
  10. The Southern Baptist Convention finally fell. They elected a black minister to a leadership position. Any church that voted against him would be declared racist and kicked out of the SBC. He is on video calling the LGBT community the "cornerstone", and when he did, his congregation got on it's feet. For those unaware, Jesus is typically referred to as the cornerstone. The cornerstone of a structure was what everything was measured against.
  11. This Bible verse makes me think Trump will win. Nations are described by animals. Russia is the bear, England the lion, Germany the Leopard. The "Great Eagle" only fits one nation. There is not a nation on this earth that would or could protect Israel in the face of the Anti Christ. The US certainly wouldn't under Clinton, Biden, or Cuomo. That's why I think that not only will Trump win, but those predicted days are right around the corner. In a very few years, America will not be great, and with a democrat CIC, we won't be strong enough to protect Israel from the Anti Christ. On an mildy related note: In many areas of prophecy, there is a lion described with wings. I think that is England while we were the colonies. In some prophecy, the eagles wings are hovering over the lions back. I think that is when we were with England in wars like WWII. In the very end times, when the AC leads an army into Israel, the lion doesn't have wings. If the US was protecting Israel from the AC, then we certainly wouldn't turn around and participate in an invasion. And, the AC wouldn't invade a nation he already controlled. Daniel saw the US forming. Daniel 7:4 The first was like a lion, and had eagle's wings: I beheld till the wings thereof were plucked, and it was lifted up from the earth, and made stand upon the feet as a man, and a man's heart was given to it. Notice the scripture is 7:4. July 4th. The eagle wings were removed from the lion and made to stand upon the feet as a man. What is another iconic symbol for the US? Uncle Sam. That's why I LOVE Biblical prophecy and that we are in the end times. And of course, now that I've predicted it in writing, it won't happen.
  12. Bless your heart, you're like a struggling alcoholic grasping for a drink. How many times does government have to be wrong, before you stop believing everything it says? If it is so "Novel", then why did the bureaucracies work so hard to sabotage use of HCQ? They should have left it up to doctors and patients. Like abortion. The private sector doctors I've been reading from have been saying all along herd immunity is the answer, and lockdowns are the wrong approach. That edit statement casts a shadow over everything you've posted.
  13. If anyone has wondered why the great deception, aside from hurting Trump, here is what I think is behind it, and what is coming: It's said by doctors in the private sector that C-19 attacks the upper respiratory system. Those areas are considered "external" because they are exposed to the outside of the body. It's said that vaccines are extremely hard for something that attacks that area. But Fauci doesn't seem to know that. But if I read the article correctly, Fauci's name will be on the vaccine patent, and he will roll in the money in the form of royalties. We the virus as weak as it is, it may even appear that the vaccine is working. They are playing it up as a terrible threat so a vaccine can be developed and mandated by law. MANDATORY vaccinations. In addition, they will try to require us to carry a vaccination card proving we took the shot if we want to travel on airplanes, trains, and buses. They may even try to track those cards for contact tracing. A year from now, when the election is over and the hype has died down, if C-19 is still around, it will be treated by a steroid dosepak and a z-pack.
  14. If deaths by C-19 are a lagging indicator, then why have the numbers been steadily declining for the last month or so, but the number of positive tests keep going up? Exactly how long will they be lagging? Are we waiting for a new flu season so we can get those numbers up? If C-19 is so deadly and worth destroying our economy and depriving citizens of liberty, why did 68% of people tested in Brooklyn test positive for the antibody? Peter Navarro got it right: https://www.westernjournal.com/wh-adviser-goes-rogue-rips-dr-fauci-scathing-op-ed/ “In late January, when I was making the case on behalf of the president to take down the flights from China, Fauci fought against the president’s courageous decision — which might well have saved hundreds of thousands of American lives,” he wrote. He continued, writing that he sounded the alarm about a coming pandemic as Fauci was on television telling the media “not to worry.” “When I was working feverishly on behalf of the president in February to help engineer the fastest industrial mobilization of the health care sector in our history, Fauci was still telling the public the China virus was low risk,” Navarro wrote. “When we were building new mask capacity in record time, Fauci was flip-flopping on the use of masks,” he added. Navarro also attacked Fauci for brushing off the potential efficacy of the anti-malarial drug hydroxychloroquine, a treatment that became a lightning rod of controversy after President Donald Trump announced he believed the drug showed promise with regard to treating the coronavirus. “And when Fauci was telling the White House Coronavirus Task Force that there was only anecdotal evidence in support of hydroxychloroquine to fight the virus, I confronted him with scientific studies providing evidence of safety and efficacy,” Navarro wrote. “A recent Detroit hospital study showed a 50% reduction in the mortality rate when the medicine is used in early treatment,” he added. A White House spokeswoman asserted Wednesday that Navarro’s Op-Ed was not approved by the Trump administration before it was published. Navarro saved his most biting criticism of Fauci, who has run the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases since 1984, for last. On comments made by Fauci last week dismissing a reported low death rate from the coronavirus in recent weeks as a “false narrative,” Navarro unloaded. “Now Fauci says a falling mortality rate doesn’t matter when it is the single most important statistic to help guide the pace of our economic reopening. The lower the mortality rate, the faster and more we can open,” Navarro wrote. “So when you ask me whether I listen to Dr. Fauci’s advice, my answer is: only with skepticism and caution,” he concluded. On July 7, Fauci stated it is “a false narrative to take comfort in a lower rate of death.” “There’s so many other things that are very dangerous and bad about this virus. Don’t get yourself into false complacency,” he said, according to Fox News.
  • Create New...