Jump to content

Brown Hawk

Members
  • Content Count

    758
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Brown Hawk

  1. Brown Hawk

    I would've suggested Minnesota but......

    Naw. Look at all the Sheriffs who aren’t enforcing the gun laws. Hawk
  2. Brown Hawk

    Random Posting

    Pancakes, waffles, and maple syrup. Also French toast. Hawk
  3. This is nothing more than another vicious brutal act of toxic masculinity. The feminists were so robbed of the opportunity to help this poor sister because some TV station had a camera and mike open somewhere. And of course they had to help the station first. Hawk
  4. Brown Hawk

    No more *** to give

    Play it through headphones. That way no one will know why you’re laughing your a$$ off at them. It’ll keep them wondering for years, which will be sweet revenge. Hawk
  5. Brown Hawk

    Two Men Stole Guns at SHOT Show

    Given some of the forklift driving I’ve seen, it could be a real advantage. 😁🤣😂. Hawk
  6. Brown Hawk

    Two Men Stole Guns at SHOT Show

    Driving a fork lift is the easy part. Getting things loaded correctly is the hard part, then driving it loaded. Hawk
  7. Brown Hawk

    Telemarketers and robocalls

    I had that problem once. After the third call, I got my referee whistle, you know, the kind you can hear in the nosebleeds? ‘Cause they even record the robot call’s. For some reason, I don’t get to use it much anymore. 😁😁😁😁😁 Hawk
  8. Brown Hawk

    Random Posting

    So you need another gun too! And you have medical proof! Hawk
  9. Actually, I ordered several thousand. 😁. Hawk
  10. Brown Hawk

    Random Posting

    I need to buy another gun. But then, I ALWAYS need to buy another gun! Hawk
  11. It ran out the door before they could cook it for you 😂🤣😂🤣. Hawk
  12. Brown Hawk

    NYC loses Amazon HQ2

    I think he might have been looking in the mirror when he made the statement. Hawk
  13. So what idiot took Schumer to a MacDonalds? Hawk
  14. Brown Hawk

    Social Justice What Does It Mean to You?

    That’s because there is no “None of the above” available. 🤔😁😂🤣. Hawk
  15. Brown Hawk

    Social Justice What Does It Mean to You?

    To me, Social Justice is a way of attacking the First Amendment freedoms of Speech, Press, and Religion. If you look, and not very hard, they are ALL under severe attack. And with those restricted, they find it even easier to attack the Second, and all the rest of our freedoms. Just look at Facebook, Twitter, Amazon, and the major media. I now retire to cool off and not continue this rant. I need to zero a couple of rifles. 😠😠 Hawk
  16. Brown Hawk

    Weed and memory...

    Only if you have the stuff delivered by semi. Daily. And probably not then. Hawk
  17. Brown Hawk

    Imponderables

    My experience is that those drawers are usually the only thing that survive moves intact. Hawk
  18. Brown Hawk

    Random Political/Social Posting

    FIFY Hawk
  19. Brown Hawk

    They were the agressors?

    Steve, the preponderance of the evidence about underage sex trafficking shows that the underage who participate later were abused at a much younger age and trained that way. So there is much more than a “shred of evidence” in favor of that being the background of these two. That is statistical evidence. On an individual level, you have a point not to be ignored, but also not to be taken without evidence. Hawk
  20. Brown Hawk

    They were the agressors?

    I already conceded your point. I refer to three criminals. You are totally ignoring both of mine. First, you say that you have facts not presented here, and say that others are only presenting opinion, so I asked that you present where you got those facts, to show that you are not posting opinion. Second, the point that the judge reduced the sentence of the pervert for no lawful reason, just his opinion. In some states, that could get the whole trial thrown out on that statement alone. If you have facts to the contrary, please share them. Additionally, that “experience” is stating widely proven facts about the sex trade in young children. Not saying it’s 100% true, but it is predominantly true. Hawk
  21. Brown Hawk

    They were the agressors?

    I understand your point perfectly. You are totally missing the point that the ringleader of the crime got a reduced sentence because he had accomplices, not for any other reason, such that he ratted them out to get a reduced sentence. You also keep stating that you have “facts pertaining to the case”, that aren’t posted here. If you have those facts, please post them here. We would all like to update ourselves. And how any of the criminals got to the crime scene is irrevelant to the fact that a crime was committed. The problem we see is that the judge reduced the sentence of the ringleader by saying the accomplices were complicit, which is the definition of an accomplice. You’re complaining that the accomplices aren’t being prosecuted or punished, and ignoring the fact that the article was about the outrage at the criminal act of the judge in reducing the criminal penalty of the ringleader because of his OPINION that the accomplices helped in the crime. Hawk
  22. Brown Hawk

    They were the agressors?

    Actually, that is the logical extension of what you said. One criminal recruits other criminals, so the original criminal gets a lessor penalty because two other criminals came in to collaborate in the crime. By law, a murder committed during a robbery makes even the getaway driver a murderer. It doesn’t get the ringleader extra time off. So if you forget the age of the two girls and just look at it as three criminals and see where your logic takes you. Their age will give them special treatment, because the law reads that way, but that is not what the article was about. And why so many here are upset by your position. Basically, the judge was guilty of malfeasance. Hawk
  23. Brown Hawk

    They were the agressors?

    You do realize that the problem here is that the judge reduced the sentence for the pervert because someone that the pervert advertised for actually answered. So what you are saying is that reducing the sentence is okay if some underage hookers answered. So you are saying to hammer the hookers, but let the pervert off lightly. Because that is where your position logically ends up. Should the sentence be reduced if a sting operation catches someone advertising for underage sex? After all, they were caught as well? Hawk
  24. Brown Hawk

    They were the agressors?

    To me, the problem is that the judge used the excuse of the girls being the aggressors to reduce the sentence of the pervert. He was still searching online and initiated contact. Would he have gotten off if he had been greeted by a female cop? If not, there should have been no reduction in this case. Period. That is the true insanity of this ruling. Hawk
  25. Brown Hawk

    Random Political/Social Posting

    Since he has already announced that he will turn over all witness testimony for perjury prosecution, all they have to do is take the fifth unless offered total immunity. And you cannot be prosecuted for taking the fifth, nor investigated, per the Supreme Court. And he has opened himself up for impeachment for malfeasance if he does not recuse himself, as he has stated that the witnesses are lying, and they haven’t even been identified yet. Hawk
×