steve4102 Posted November 25, 2018 Share Posted November 25, 2018 25 minutes ago, Dric902 said: "There should be more restrictions on how guns are purchased,” Paul McQuillen, director of the Buffalo chapter of New Yorkers Against Gun Violence (NYAGC), told ABC-affiliate WFTS. “We should have more background checks.” GUN CONTROL: NEW YORK WANTS TO MAKE YOU SUBMIT SOCIAL MEDIA HISTORY BEFORE PURCHASING GUN BY ARISTOS GEORGIOU even the journalist, a group not known for their intellect, gets the intent stated in the article itself. the defenders and detractors get the idea clearly stated. Perhaps your more advanced at parsing phrases and nuance than a Newsweek journalist. I don’t want to be . Show us where even this Brain Dead journalist said this NY law is tied to Federal Legislation (NICS). Man the stupid runs deep in you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crockett Posted November 25, 2018 Share Posted November 25, 2018 . 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve4102 Posted November 25, 2018 Share Posted November 25, 2018 8 minutes ago, crockett said: . Don't forget the beers! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dric902 Posted November 25, 2018 Author Share Posted November 25, 2018 32 minutes ago, steve4102 said: Show us where even this Brain Dead journalist said this NY law is tied to Federal Legislation (NICS). Man the stupid runs deep in you. Bye, buy, by. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve4102 Posted November 25, 2018 Share Posted November 25, 2018 4 minutes ago, Dric902 said: Bye, buy, by. . About time. Whew, glad that's over. Now back to common sense combined with some knowledge and intellect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dric902 Posted November 25, 2018 Author Share Posted November 25, 2018 (edited) How the 'digital exhaust' of social media data can predict gun violence Gun deaths correlate to searches for ‘ammo’, one expert says, as social media gurus look to work around federal gun research ban with an innovative website https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/mar/14/digital-exhaust-social-media-data-gun-violence-predictions Unveiled at the SXSW technology festival, a group of data scientists and activists have demonstrated for the first time a new way to predict and study gun violence using social media. Scraping Tweets, Google searches, obituaries and local news, they’ve created a livesteam of gun-related discussion and a map of violence and geo-tagged posts. By reading this “digital exhaust” of data they hope to create “digital phenotypes” and understand how people are behaving around guns, when and why. The data’s there, or it can be there easily. The FBI has data. The police have data. But we’re forced to do this because no one is allowed to share it,” said Jessyca Dudley, program officer of the Joyce Foundation’s gun violence prevention program. Honing in on Austin, using the new site can zoom through different different neighborhoods reading geo-tagged tweets talking about people hearing gun shots or debating policy. It’s timely here in Austin where a gun rights activist was recently shot by her toddler. Data is key for making legislation http://mediashift.org/2013/02/10-social-media-moments-that-shaped-the-gun-control-debate051/ these people donate to Democrooks, the timing to coincide with the House going to the Democraps is suspect. . Edited November 25, 2018 by Dric902 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve4102 Posted November 25, 2018 Share Posted November 25, 2018 (edited) 18 minutes ago, Dric902 said: How the 'digital exhaust' of social media data can predict gun violence Gun deaths correlate to searches for ‘ammo’, one expert says, as social media gurus look to work around federal gun research ban with an innovative website https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/mar/14/digital-exhaust-social-media-data-gun-violence-predictions Unveiled at the SXSW technology festival, a group of data scientists and activists have demonstrated for the first time a new way to predict and study gun violence using social media. Scraping Tweets, Google searches, obituaries and local news, they’ve created a livesteam of gun-related discussion and a map of violence and geo-tagged posts. By reading this “digital exhaust” of data they hope to create “digital phenotypes” and understand how people are behaving around guns, when and why. The data’s there, or it can be there easily. The FBI has data. The police have data. But we’re forced to do this because no one is allowed to share it,” said Jessyca Dudley, program officer of the Joyce Foundation’s gun violence prevention program. Honing in on Austin, using the new site can zoom through different different neighborhoods reading geo-tagged tweets talking about people hearing gun shots or debating policy. It’s timely here in Austin where a gun rights activist was recently shot by her toddler. Data is key for making legislation http://mediashift.org/2013/02/10-social-media-moments-that-shaped-the-gun-control-debate051/ these people donate to Democrooks, the timing to coincide with the House going to the Democraps is suspect. . What does this have to do with your OP and NICS? Edited November 25, 2018 by steve4102 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwalchmai Posted November 27, 2018 Share Posted November 27, 2018 How the 'digital exhaust' of social media data can predict gun violence Gun deaths correlate to searches for ‘ammo’, one expert says, as social media gurus look to work around federal gun research ban with an innovative website https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/mar/14/digital-exhaust-social-media-data-gun-violence-predictions Unveiled at the SXSW technology festival, a group of data scientists and activists have demonstrated for the first time a new way to predict and study gun violence using social media. Scraping Tweets, Google searches, obituaries and local news, they’ve created a livesteam of gun-related discussion and a map of violence and geo-tagged posts. By reading this “digital exhaust” of data they hope to create “digital phenotypes” and understand how people are behaving around guns, when and why. The data’s there, or it can be there easily. The FBI has data. The police have data. But we’re forced to do this because no one is allowed to share it,” said Jessyca Dudley, program officer of the Joyce Foundation’s gun violence prevention program. Honing in on Austin, using the new site can zoom through different different neighborhoods reading geo-tagged tweets talking about people hearing gun shots or debating policy. It’s timely here in Austin where a gun rights activist was recently shot by her toddler. Data is key for making legislation http://mediashift.org/2013/02/10-social-media-moments-that-shaped-the-gun-control-debate051/ these people donate to Democrooks, the timing to coincide with the House going to the Democraps is suspect. .I think research is needed to correlate the incidence of “y” in name spellings with idiotic ideas.Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cougar_ml Posted November 27, 2018 Share Posted November 27, 2018 The issue I see with this is a person that doesn't engage in social media. So you have no passwords to hand over. Do you really think they will believe in this day and age that that a person isn't always on social media? So if a person has no social media accounts, they have no passwords to hand over. I can see them doing an automatic denial on purchasing a firearm because you "refused" to give them your account information. How exactly does a person go about proving that they DON'T have any social media accounts? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bish1309 Posted November 27, 2018 Share Posted November 27, 2018 On 11/24/2018 at 5:59 PM, Huaco Kid said: 久聞大名, Turkey Sandwich? I don't get it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cougar_ml Posted November 27, 2018 Share Posted November 27, 2018 6 minutes ago, Bish1309 said: Turkey Sandwich? I don't get it. The person probably went into a tattoo parlor and asked for something really cool or profound to be tattooed onto their arm in Chinese. Tattoo artist doesn't know Chinese so they picked the first random thing (or not so random thing) they found, and tattooed that instead, figuring by the time anyone figured it out they'd have already been paid anyway. That and some people are just jerks. Either that or they asked someone they know to write out the symbols for something, then took it in, and that person they asked was the jerk. Either way, someone was a jerk, and an idiot ended up with a really stupid tattoo on their arm because of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
minderasr Posted November 27, 2018 Share Posted November 27, 2018 Just remember people, they are not coming for your guns. Amirite? ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Historian Posted November 27, 2018 Share Posted November 27, 2018 On 11/25/2018 at 4:10 PM, Dric902 said: even the journalist, a group not known for their intellect, gets the intent stated in the article itself. the defenders and detractors get the idea clearly stated. I'll assume you'll make an exclusion for me as a journalist. I may not work at a daily anymore but still freelance ocassiinally. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SevenSixtyTwo Posted November 28, 2018 Share Posted November 28, 2018 On 11/24/2018 at 8:17 PM, gwalchmai said: No problem. I've never said anything controversial on social media. I never posted anything racist on Glock Talk but... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dric902 Posted November 28, 2018 Author Share Posted November 28, 2018 1 hour ago, Historian said: I'll assume you'll make an exclusion for me as a journalist. I may not work at a daily anymore but still freelance ocassiinally. Exceptions make the rule ? . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brown Hawk Posted November 28, 2018 Share Posted November 28, 2018 4 hours ago, Cougar_ml said: The issue I see with this is a person that doesn't engage in social media. So you have no passwords to hand over. Do you really think they will believe in this day and age that that a person isn't always on social media? So if a person has no social media accounts, they have no passwords to hand over. I can see them doing an automatic denial on purchasing a firearm because you "refused" to give them your account information. How exactly does a person go about proving that they DON'T have any social media accounts? Doesn’t really matter. It is just a way to deny people the ability to buy a gun. They just want to deny people the ability to buy guns. They won’t run the social media, but find evidence they say makes the petition “deniable”, don’t bother to run the NICS, charge you an arm and a leg for the “checks”, and tell you it was denied, implying that it was from the NICS. Most people won’t have the money to spend on a lawyer to fight it and will meekly give up on the idea, or so they think. Hawk 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now