Jump to content

Random Political/Social Posting


Eric
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 111.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • pipedreams

    46972

  • ChuteTheMall

    19230

  • Swampfox762

    10052

  • Schmidt Meister

    9252

6 minutes ago, pipedreams said:

Did you notice the dog???

 

z.jpeg

A little hard to miss, but toothless.  And the asses (donkeys) of msnbc and the New York Times are looking in the wrong direction.  

Hawk 

ETA:  And those Circle D’s Look more like brainless paper targets.

Edited by Brown Hawk
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On a current topic, I am somewhat puzzled over the frenetic outcry over the disappearance of Jamal Khashoggi.

He was a journalist, no, strike that, he was a reporter.  Journalism as a profession no longer exists.

He was a reporter for the Washington Post and given his location, I assume he reported on the Middle East.

So, this man wasn't a revered civil rights leader, not a great scientist, no Novel Prize, even the fake ones, were awarded him.

He was not a famous movie or television actor nor a songwriter/performer of repute.

I suggest that 99.5% of the American populace had never heard of him before he walked into a Saudi embassy.

So, why are the media and the professional liars insisting that we disrupt the entire balance of power in the world because, as stated, he walked into a Saudi embassy and purportedly, didn't walk out?

No one seemed that upset when ISIS decapitated Daniel Pearl.    He was a reporter as well.  The Middle East was his beat.

Could it be because Daniel Pearl worked for the Wall Street Journal?  Or perhaps because he was an Israeli?  Or that there was no mystery, no international intrigue about his murder at the hands of savages?

 

I wish Mr. Khashoggi no harm or ill will and hope he is well , but why is he now a symbol of -- heck, I have no idea what he is a symbol of.

Edited by tous
  • Like 3
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, tous said:

On a current topic, I am somewhat puzzled over the frenetic outcry over the disappearance of Jamal Khashoggi.

He was a journalist, no, strike that, he was a reporter.  Journalism as a profession no longer exists.

He was a reporter for the Washington Post and given his location, I assume he reported on the Middle East.

So, this man wasn't a revered civil rights leader, not a great scientist, no Novel Prize, even the fake ones, were awarded him.

He was not a famous movie or television actor nor a songwriter/performer of repute.

I suggest that 99.5% of the American populace had never heard of him before he walked into a Saudi embassy.

So, why are the media and the professional liars insisting that we disrupt the entire balance of power in the world because, as stated, he walked into a Saudi embassy and purportedly, didn't walk out?

No one seemed that upset when ISIS decapitated Daniel Pearl.    He was a reporter as well.  The Middle East was his beat.

Could it be because Daniel Pearl worked for the Wall Street Journal?  Or perhaps because he was an Israeli?  Or that there was no mystery, no international intrigue about his murder at the hands of savages?

 

I wish Mr. Khashoggi no harm or ill will and hope he is well , but why is he now a symbol of -- heck, I have no idea what he is a symbol of.

I could only suggest that it is because of the adversarial relationship of the press with the current administration.

to see if he will;

1) refer to his work as fake news

2) not act decisively due to the profession of the missing raghead reporter

3) how they can spin either 1 or 2

4) write a story of how brave and courageous they must be to work in the profession with all the threats to their lives and safety.

 

.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good answer, amigo, but we might leave off the disparaging label for the missing reporter.

For all we know, he may be, or was, a heck of a nice guy.

I agree that the media couldn't care less about the poor man's fate.

It is just another cudgel to beat Mr. Trump with.

Edited by tous
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

bb-5bc311c89d996.thumb.png.5ae22cef596fee0e2e2dbc7d514ffbff.png


There is nothing personal in the Left’s assault on traditional families that evolved in Western Civilization. They represent a problem to those whom wish to implement cultural and sociological change because traditional families have value systems that are not typically susceptible to the ideology required to support and tolerate a socialistic/communistic political system that knowledgeable and/or intelligent people recognize as a dangerous, inevitable shift towards totalitarian government.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, tous said:

Good answer, amigo, but we might leave off the disparaging label for the missing reporter.

For all we know, he may be, or was, a heck of a nice guy.

I agree that the media couldn't care less about the poor man's fate.

It is just another cudgel to beat Mr. Trump with.

The best I could make out of all the stories about this guy. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, tous said:

On a current topic, I am somewhat puzzled over the frenetic outcry over the disappearance of Jamal Khashoggi.

He was a journalist, no, strike that, he was a reporter.  Journalism as a profession no longer exists.

He was a reporter for the Washington Post and given his location, I assume he reported on the Middle East.

So, this man wasn't a revered civil rights leader, not a great scientist, no Novel Prize, even the fake ones, were awarded him.

He was not a famous movie or television actor nor a songwriter/performer of repute.

I suggest that 99.5% of the American populace had never heard of him before he walked into a Saudi embassy.

So, why are the media and the professional liars insisting that we disrupt the entire balance of power in the world because, as stated, he walked into a Saudi embassy and purportedly, didn't walk out?

No one seemed that upset when ISIS decapitated Daniel Pearl.    He was a reporter as well.  The Middle East was his beat.

Could it be because Daniel Pearl worked for the Wall Street Journal?  Or perhaps because he was an Israeli?  Or that there was no mystery, no international intrigue about his murder at the hands of savages?

 

I wish Mr. Khashoggi no harm or ill will and hope he is well , but why is he now a symbol of -- heck, I have no idea what he is a symbol of.

I believe, that in the eyes of those who claim to be "journalists", but lack the morals and ethics, they think that since they see themselves as the purveyors of "how everybody else should think and run their lives",  that they are a privileged class, and must be untouchable by governments and those who fight against governments (including criminals).

To find out that their opinion of themselves is horribly overestimated and distorted, is a reality that they struggle with.  After all, what higher calling is there then be able to tell people what to think, and how to think.  After all, they know it's for the peoples benefit to have a (presumably) smarter and more qualified group to lead them.  All hail the Media...………………….

Edited by janice6
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well said, amigo.

You recall the movies of the 1930s and 1940s.  Newspaper reporters were heroes, men and women that waged battle against the criminal and corrupt.

Now, it seems that they simply re-type the Democrat talking points and read them from a TelPrompTer or revise them into column inches.

I cannot recall the last time I read a newspaper, but I can also recall a time when I read one or two everyday.

:sigh:

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, C_Hallbert said:

There is nothing personal in the Left’s assault on traditional families that evolved in Western Civilization. They represent a problem to those whom wish to implement cultural and sociological change because traditional families have value systems that are not typically susceptible to the ideology required to support and tolerate a socialistic/communistic political system that knowledgeable and/or intelligent people recognize as a dangerous, inevitable shift towards totalitarian government.

Quoted for TRUTH!

This needs to be on every printed media front page, and recited on electronic.

Edited by BamaBud
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Please Donate To TBS

    Please donate to TBS.
    Your support is needed and it is greatly appreciated.
×
×
  • Create New...