Jump to content

The Bore Site Is Moving


Eric
 Share

Recommended Posts

The University of Utah sold computers with the new “massive” 40mb internal hard drive. A few days later they released the new version of Word Perfect. The University had declared the latest WP was what everyone would use.

The new computers could not run the new WP with only a 40mb drive. 

They had to buy all of them back and sold them as surplus. 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators
1 minute ago, Batesmotel said:

The University of Utah sold computers with the new “massive” 40mb internal hard drive. A few days later they released the new version of Word Perfect. The University had declared the latest WP was what everyone would use.

The new computers could not run the new WP with only a 40mb drive. 

They had to buy all of them back and sold them as surplus. 

Do you remember Word Star? Back in the day, I really resisted transitioning to Word Perfect because I was more comfortable with Word Star. Long time ago.  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators
5 minutes ago, Batesmotel said:

The University of Utah sold computers with the new “massive” 40mb internal hard drive. A few days later they released the new version of Word Perfect. The University had declared the latest WP was what everyone would use.

The new computers could not run the new WP with only a 40mb drive. 

They had to buy all of them back and sold them as surplus. 

 

1 minute ago, Eric said:

Do you remember Word Star? Back in the day, I really resisted transitioning to Word Perfect because I was more comfortable with Word Star. Long time ago.  


1F2711F9-6B42-47C4-82E7-5716E23D611E.jpeg.ef33d2339392430637f3729a5b468c2c.jpeg
 

Today, I mostly use Nano as a text editor from the command line on servers and it doesn’t look a hell of a lot different. I coded a lot of BASIC on Word Star though. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Eric said:

Do you remember Word Star? Back in the day, I really resisted transitioning to Word Perfect because I was more comfortable with Word Star. Long time ago.  

I don’t remember it. But my high school only had three computers and only the one in the electronics lab worked. Word Perfect was out when I finished went to college. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Eric said:

Do you remember Word Star? Back in the day, I really resisted transitioning to Word Perfect because I was more comfortable with Word Star. Long time ago.  

I used WordStar on CP/M and DOS. Had an add-on which would properly place footnotes at page bottoms. Even wrote a few printer drivers. Found a programmer’s editor which used all the WordStar commands but did not set last letters high for word wrap. Skipped Word Perfect and driven kicking and screaming to Word for Windows. By that time I had no need for anything complex so never learned most of Word. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/27/2020 at 6:11 PM, Historian said:

The industry is young and changes frequently. What is in vogue today was not realistic 10 years ago.

Not anyone is up to date..unless you're a true industry insider.

I have said that Windows converted me from a guru to a barely adequate user. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, railfancwb said:

I have said that Windows converted me from a guru to a barely adequate user. 

People get comfortable with what they know.   It was like the jump from Windows 2003 to 2012/16 that caused people to install software that made the new OS looking like the Old OS.

Big changes like the one you are talking about are challenging.

Increasingly, i am see demands for system managers to know Linux as well as Windows and have more of a Dev Op system of management.   It's not just running an OS....but being able to run it  by programing skills.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, pipedreams said:

CP/M and DOS are history.  My company sent me to a 5 day 8 hour a day Unix training class and now the only thing I remember is how to spell Unix.

I know early versions of Windows had to set atop DOS - kinda like an upside down pyramid. Does Windows 10 set atop DOS or was that kludge eliminated at some point?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Historian said:

People get comfortable with what they know.   It was like the jump from Windows 2003 to 2012/16 that caused people to install software that made the new OS looking like the Old OS.

Big changes like the one you are talking about are challenging.

Increasingly, i am see demands for system managers to know Linux as well as Windows and have more of a Dev Op system of management.   It's not just running an OS....but being able to run it  by programing skills.

At my pre-retirement employer networking entered with a whimper when I networked three accounting computers to run a multi user accounting system on DOS. The Champion Accounting was dBase compiled with Clipper. Used coax and funny connectors. And special network cards. In due course the company went to Ethernet using Netware I believe, but my stepping back to user was happening. About that time an IT person was hired. Think they went to Microsoft Net and later Linux but by then Champion Accounting had been replaced and my knowledge level was who to call if things quit working. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, railfancwb said:

At my pre-retirement employer networking entered with a whimper when I networked three accounting computers to run a multi user accounting system on DOS. The Champion Accounting was dBase compiled with Clipper. Used coax and funny connectors. And special network cards. In due course the company went to Ethernet using Netware I believe, but my stepping back to user was happening. About that time an IT person was hired. Think they went to Microsoft Net and later Linux but by then Champion Accounting had been replaced and my knowledge level was who to call if things quit working. 

Wow.  Vampire clips/taps perhaps?  That sounds like what you might have been using for the early networking.  Would have been a token ring network, i guess.   Talk about the early days.

In some ways i miss NetWare as i think it was far better that Microsoft for a long time.  Groupwise was a hell of a lot easier to manage than Exchange.

.Vampire tap - Wikipedia

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/27/2020 at 7:19 PM, kerbie18 said:

Just promise me the new server won't become self aware. I don't want to be around when your server gains conciousness. Nope...nope...nope...

How would the server gain consciousness, none of our nations most important people haven't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/29/2020 at 10:11 PM, Batesmotel said:

I don’t remember it. But my high school only had three computers and only the one in the electronics lab worked. Word Perfect was out when I finished went to college. 

My son hired on at Unocal right out of high school. 1993. The entire refinery had 3, that's right, 3 computers, and no one knew how to properly use them. He installed computers all over the plant, networked them and then had to teach everyone how to use them. He has some stories. I still run into people that worked there back then and get to hear about how impressed they were with his abilities. He was loved there by many.

He had the first bulletin board on the Kenai Peninsula when he was still in school. Our basement was full of those modems that screeched at you. He dug a ditch in from the street to the house and buried 25 pair phone lines in conduit and installed a metal box on the wall inside to support it and hook all those modems up.

I still have a closet full of his books on how to program in all these different languages.

While in high school, he was teaching a college class for computers in the evenings at the very same high school he was attending. He had a gigantic ring of keys to the school. He had 24 hr access to it. I went down there with him several times late at night for whatever errands or to pick him up. Was interesting to wander all through this school with him and no one else there. We even went through utility corridors that the teachers who worked there probably didn't even know about. 

I remember watching him when he had gotten a new programming book. He opened it up, started from the back, scanning pages running his hand over them zigzag fashion as he went down the page speed reading. I watched him for a bit and then asked what he was doing. Turns out he knew what was in the front of the book and was going backwards to get through the parts he didn't know yet. When he got through the new stuff and started seeing the stuff he already knew, that was where he stopped searching and began to study and learn the new stuff. Blew me away.

A relative of mine had met my son at a family funeral when he was in grade school. The relative owned a store in Seattle and one of the things he sold was computers. He spent a lot of time in conversation with my son. After we got back home to Alaska I got a call from that relative who I barely knew. He wanted to know if it was o.k. to give my son a computer. He was asking because he didn't want to cause problems by just sending one without asking first. Yes, you can send him a computer. A brand new IBM showed up in the mail. My son put it in his room and disappeared. This was 1986 and he was 11 years old. Not many kids had a computer of any kind in their room in 1986. 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In 1971, the US Army offered to send me to computer school. It probably was because of my inordinate skills at, among others, distinguishing between a flat-head screwdriver and a hammer.

It sounded like a trap. Moreso because I thought that computers were just a passing fad. I declined.

That'll learn them!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I started working at UNIVAC Computers were only mainframes.  The computer could only work on one program at a time.  As a consequence, account running the program had to pay for the total cost of all the personnel running the computer,  The buildings containing the computers, the environmental control (air conditioning of the buildings) and all the electrical energy to run the tube computers.  The electrical power consumption of a tube computer was unbelievable.

So, our computers were sold to the Navy.  The Navy contracts were billed the hundreds of thousand's of dollars to run the computer. 

The computers occupied environmentally controlled building space when the company itself couldn't afford air conditioning for its employees. 

The computer floors were false floors to allow all the inter-rack cables and power to be hidden from the actual computer spaces.  We had buildings dedicated to a particular computer. 

I had numerous times when working with the tube computers where it was more expedient to walk from the top of one computer cabinet rack to another, rather than crawl down to the floor, go a hundred feet to another rack and then climb up to the top again for cable troubleshooting. 

If UNIVAC had a computer program it wanted to run, but wasn't directly billable to a particular Navy contract,  we simply couldn't use the computer due to the horrendous costs of the entire computer.  We couldn't afford to use the computers we built for the Navy.

Then Multitasking came about.  Now our costs of using the computer were billed only on the actual run time as a proportion of the total cost of running the computer.  Multitasking made our cost of using the same Navy computer to hundreds of dollars, and now it was affordable.

 

Edited by janice6
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/24/2020 at 4:56 PM, Eric said:

The box isn't a beast, but it's enough for the site's current needs:

CPUs: Dual E-2176G 3.7GHz Hexa-Core Coffee Lake Xeon Processors (12 Cores)

RAM: 32GB

RAID 10 SATA Array and SSD drives.

It is a decent step up from the current box and I switched back over to the Ubuntu Server OS. I never should have gotten away from it.

It's got coffee in it, that sounds good. But I don't need a server, I can pour my own. 

Edited by ChuteTheMall
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/7/2020 at 1:22 PM, railfancwb said:

D3A0D230-BC7F-4F6F-AD6D-794576A30645.gif

Ha! I was just reading last night about this very technology.

In telecommunications, orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing is a type of digital transmission and a method of encoding digital data on multiple carrier frequencies.

Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing

Would rather read a history book.

Edited by Historian
  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Time-division multiplexing is a method of transmitting and receiving independent signals over a common signal path by means of synchronized switches at each end of the transmission line so that each signal appears on the line only a fraction of time in an alternating pattern.

Time Division Multiplexing(TDM) - Instrumentation Forum

Frequency-division multiplexing is a technique by which the total bandwidth available in a communication medium is divided into a series of non-overlapping frequency bands, each of which is used to carry a separate signal.

Frequency Division - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics

Edited by Historian
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Eric unpinned this topic

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Please Donate To TBS

    Please donate to TBS.
    Your support is needed and it is greatly appreciated.
×
×
  • Create New...